Peugeot 807 MOT Results

Registered in 2009
47.6% pass rate
from 189 tests in 2021
(42% worse than other 2009 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 807 is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Brakes (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 18% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 17% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 17% fail on Rbt (sp) (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 6.3% fail on Rbt (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 6.3% fail on Parking brake performance (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.53% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.53% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.53% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.53% fail on Rbt
          • 0.53% fail on Service brake performance
    • 4.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.1% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.1% fail on Parking brake control (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Lever (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Pedal (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.1% fail on Flexible brake hoses (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 23% fail on Suspension (55% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 7.4% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 7.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.53% fail on Linkage
    • 6.3% fail on Springs
      • 6.3% fail on Coil springs
        • 6.3% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.53% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.53% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.53% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.53% fail on Ball joint
  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (55% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Headlamps (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (54 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.3% fail on Direction indicators (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Flashing type (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.8% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Transmission (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 7.9% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.53% fail on Joints
    • 6.3% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Doors (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Other passenger's door (24 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Door condition (25 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.53% fail on Door condition
    • 0.53% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.53% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.53% fail on Seats
      • 0.53% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 12% fail on Visibility (97% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Washers (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
  • 5.3% fail on Tyres
    • 3.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
  • 4.8% fail on Steering
    • 4.8% fail on Steering linkage components (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Track rod end (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 3.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.1% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.53% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.53% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.53% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.53% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.53% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.53% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

  • Peugeot 807 (2003 - 2010)
    Practical, versatile cabin packed with safety and comfort features. Most seat seven. Easy to drive. Five-star crash test rating.

    Search Good Garages