Suzuki Swift MOT Results

Registered in 1996
54.0% pass rate
from 63 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Swift is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 9.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.3% fail on Rbt
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 6.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.2% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.6% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.6% fail on Master cylinder
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Transmission
      • 4.8% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.8% fail on Joints
    • 3.2% fail on Chassis
      • 3.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Doors
      • 1.6% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 1.6% fail on Door condition
    • 1.6% fail on Floor
  • 14% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 11% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 11% fail on Spark ignition
        • 6.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 4.8% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Fluid leaks (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Engine oil leaks (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 9.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 6.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.8% fail on Suspension arm (18 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 7.9% fail on Visibility
    • 7.9% fail on Wipers
  • 6.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.6% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.6% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas

Search Good Garages