Renault Espace MOT Results

Registered in 1999

48.3% pass rate

from 151 tests in 2017

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Espace is unusually good or bad.

30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 11% fail on Headlamp aim
- 7.9% fail on Headlamps
  - 6.6% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.66% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
    - 0.66% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
  - 0.66% fail on Switch
- 7.3% fail on Position lamps
  - 4.6% fail on Rear lamps
  - 3.3% fail on Front lamps
- 7.3% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.3% fail on Direction indicators
  - 3.3% fail on Flashing type
    - 2.0% fail on Individual lamps
    - 1.3% fail on All direction indicators
- 2.0% fail on Battery
- 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
  - 2.0% fail on Fog lamp
- 1.3% fail on Electrical wiring (12 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.66% fail on Hazard warning
  - 0.66% fail on Lamp
19% fail on Suspension
- 7.3% fail on Drive shafts
  - 6.6% fail on Front drive shafts
    - 6.6% fail on Constant velocity joints
  - 0.66% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
    - 0.66% fail on Drive shafts
- 6.6% fail on Coil springs (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 6.6% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 4.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 2.0% fail on Suspension arms
  - 2.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
  - 0.66% fail on Front
  - 0.66% fail on Rear
- 0.66% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.66% fail on Condition
- 0.66% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.66% fail on Condition
- 0.66% fail on Front suspension joints
- 0.66% fail on Shock absorbers
  - 0.66% fail on Condition
- 0.66% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 0.66% fail on Component mounting
19% fail on Driver's view of the road (99% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 13% fail on Washers (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 9.9% fail on Wipers
17% fail on Brakes
- 12% fail on Brake performance
  - 6.0% fail on Parking brake performance
  - 4.6% fail on Front wheels
  - 3.3% fail on Rear wheels
  - 2.0% fail on Brake imbalance
- 6.6% fail on Hub components (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 5.3% fail on Brake pads (160% worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 1.3% fail on Brake discs
- 6.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 6.0% fail on Components
    - 4.6% fail on Pipes
    - 1.3% fail on Hoses
- 0.66% fail on Parking brake
  - 0.66% fail on Condition
- 0.66% fail on ABS
12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 7.9% fail on Emissions
- 3.3% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested
- 1.3% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.66% fail on Tank
  - 0.66% fail on Pipe
6.6% fail on Tyres
- 4.0% fail on Tread depth
- 3.3% fail on Condition
6.0% fail on Steering
- 4.6% fail on Steering system
  - 4.0% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.66% fail on Steering arm
- 0.66% fail on Steering control
  - 0.66% fail on Steering coupling
    - 0.66% fail on Universal joint
- 0.66% fail on Steering operation
5.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
- 3.3% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
  - 3.3% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 2.0% fail on Seat belts
  - 2.0% fail on Requirements (21 times worse than other 1999 cars)
4.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
- 2.6% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 2.6% fail on Passengers other (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.66% fail on Load security
  - 0.66% fail on Tailgate
2.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
- 2.0% fail on Registration plate