Renault Espace MOT Results

Registered in 1999

56.8% pass rate

from 88 tests in 2020

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Espace is unusually good or bad.

20% fail on Brakes
- 13% fail on Brake performance
  - 5.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 5.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 4.5% fail on Service brake performance
    - 4.5% fail on Rbt
      - 4.5% fail on Service brake performance
  - 4.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 4.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 3.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
  - 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 1.1% fail on Rbt
      - 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
- 5.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 5.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    - 5.7% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 1.1% fail on Brake discs
- 2.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 2.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 2.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 1.1% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 1.1% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 1.1% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
19% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 8.0% fail on Transmission
  - 8.0% fail on Drive shafts
    - 8.0% fail on Joints
- 5.7% fail on Exhaust system
- 5.7% fail on Fuel system (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 4.5% fail on Tank (39 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Pipe
- 2.3% fail on Doors
  - 2.3% fail on Other passenger's door (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    - 2.3% fail on Door condition (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Engine mounting
  - 1.1% fail on Engine mounting condition
16% fail on Suspension
- 9.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 4.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 2.3% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 5.7% fail on Springs
  - 5.7% fail on Coil springs
    - 5.7% fail on Coil spring
- 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
  - 2.3% fail on Ball joint
  - 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
- 2.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
15% fail on Visibility
- 8.0% fail on Wipers
- 8.0% fail on Washers
- 1.1% fail on View to rear
  - 1.1% fail on Mirrors
10% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Headlamps
  - 3.4% fail on Headlamp
- 3.4% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 3.4% fail on Battery(ies) (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Direction indicators
  - 2.3% fail on Flashing type
    - 2.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.1% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
10% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 9.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 8.0% fail on Spark ignition
    - 4.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 2.3% fail on Emissions not tested
    - 1.1% fail on Non catalyst emissions
  - 2.3% fail on Compression ignition
    - 2.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (14 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 2.3% fail on Engine oil leaks
6.8% fail on Steering
- 5.7% fail on Steering gear (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 4.5% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Operation
- 1.1% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 1.1% fail on Track rod end
4.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 3.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
- 2.3% fail on Seat belts
  - 1.1% fail on Requirements
  - 1.1% fail on Condition
3.4% fail on Tyres
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 1.1% fail on Tread depth
1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 1.1% fail on Registration plates