MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Mitsubishi » Delica / L300 / L400 » 1999

Mitsubishi Delica / L300 / L400 MOT Results

Registered in 1999
55.7% pass rate
from 79 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Delica / L300 / L400 is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 7.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.3% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 1.3% fail on Horn
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.3% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 7.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 5.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 5.1% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 6.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.8% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.3% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.3% fail on Brake fluid
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.3% fail on Transmission
      • 3.8% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.5% fail on Joints
        • 1.3% fail on Drive shaft
      • 2.5% fail on Prop shafts (9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Prop shaft (73 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Chassis
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.3% fail on Cabs
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 11% fail on Steering (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 8.9% fail on Steering gear (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 8.9% fail on Steering rack (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.3% fail on Steering play
      • 1.3% fail on Steering rack
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 3.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.8% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.5% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 3.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 5.1% fail on Visibility
    • 3.8% fail on Washers
    • 1.3% fail on Wipers
  • 2.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.5% fail on Condition
  • 2.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 1.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.5% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.3% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages