Hyundai Amica MOT Results

Registered in 2003
51.8% pass rate
from 56 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai Amica is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Brakes
    • 23% fail on Brake performance (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 16% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 14% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 11% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 1.8% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 11% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 7.1% fail on Service brake performance (10 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 7.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 8.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.8% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.8% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 1.8% fail on Cable
  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 7.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 7.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 7.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 7.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.6% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.8% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 7.1% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.4% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.6% fail on Sub-frames (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Sub-frame
      • 1.8% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.1% fail on Transmission
      • 5.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 5.4% fail on Joints
      • 1.8% fail on Prop shafts
        • 1.8% fail on Joints
    • 3.6% fail on Doors (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Driver's door (28 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Door condition (31 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 1.8% fail on Door condition
    • 1.8% fail on Body
      • 1.8% fail on Other body component
    • 1.8% fail on Seats
      • 1.8% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 13% fail on Tyres
    • 11% fail on Tread depth
    • 7.1% fail on Condition
  • 7.1% fail on Visibility
    • 7.1% fail on Wipers
  • 3.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 1.8% fail on Steering
    • 1.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.8% fail on Track rod end
  • 1.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.8% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages