Ford Puma MOT Results

Registered in 1997
57.6% pass rate
from 66 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Puma is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Suspension
    • 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (160% worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Shock absorbers (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 6.1% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.0% fail on Macpherson strut (11 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.5% fail on Springs
      • 1.5% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.5% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.5% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.5% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 20% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 11% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
        • 9.1% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Prop shafts
        • 1.5% fail on Joints
    • 4.5% fail on Chassis
      • 4.5% fail on Chassis condition
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.5% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.5% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.5% fail on Spare wheel
      • 1.5% fail on Spare wheel condition
  • 15% fail on Brakes
    • 9.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 3.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt
          • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.5% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.0% fail on Flexible brake hoses (6 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.5% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 1.5% fail on Cable
    • 1.5% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 1.5% fail on Other braking system component
    • 1.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 15% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 14% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
      • 14% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Position lamp
  • 7.6% fail on Tyres
    • 6.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
  • 6.1% fail on Visibility
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers
    • 1.5% fail on Washers
  • 3.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 1.5% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.5% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages