Citroen Xsara Picasso MOT Results

Registered in 2010
69.4% pass rate
from 1,598 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Xsara Picasso is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (22% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Stop lamp (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamps (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp (96% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.88% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.6% fail on Direction indicators (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Flashing type (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Individual lamps (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.063% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim (44% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.31% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.19% fail on Tell tale (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Horn
    • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.063% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 8.4% fail on Tyres
    • 5.6% fail on Condition (67% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.19% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.063% fail on Size/type
  • 4.9% fail on Suspension (39% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Coil springs (43% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Condition (46% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Location
    • 1.2% fail on Drive shafts
      • 1.2% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 1.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.94% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.063% fail on Condition
    • 0.31% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.31% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.063% fail on General condition
    • 0.063% fail on Axles
      • 0.063% fail on Axle beam
    • 0.063% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.063% fail on Condition
  • 4.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust system (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.063% fail on Emissions
    • 0.063% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.063% fail on System
    • 0.063% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.1% fail on Brakes (45% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Hub components (48% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake pads (50% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.56% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.50% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.44% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.25% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.31% fail on ABS
    • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.19% fail on Components
        • 0.13% fail on Hoses
        • 0.063% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.063% fail on Leaks
    • 0.063% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.063% fail on Condition
  • 1.9% fail on Driver's view of the road (59% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Wipers (67% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Washers (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
  • 1.4% fail on Steering
    • 0.81% fail on Steering system
      • 0.63% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.13% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.50% fail on Power steering (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Other components (29 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.063% fail on Rams
    • 0.13% fail on Steering operation
  • 1.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (97% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.81% fail on Seat belts (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Prescribed areas (91 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Condition
      • 0.063% fail on Requirements
    • 0.25% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.25% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.63% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.31% fail on Seats (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Passengers (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Drivers
    • 0.25% fail on Spare wheel (40 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Vehicle structure (35 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Chassis (35 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.13% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.13% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.063% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.063% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages