Citroen Synergie MOT Results

Registered in 1999
52.8% pass rate
from 89 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Citroen Synergie is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Suspension arms (170% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 4.5% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.4% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.4% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 1.1% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts
    • 3.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 3.4% fail on Component mounting
    • 1.1% fail on Coil springs
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Radius arms
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.1% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 7.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 6.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.4% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Rear lamps
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.2% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.1% fail on Battery
    • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.1% fail on Fog lamp
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 9.0% fail on Components
        • 4.5% fail on Hoses
        • 4.5% fail on Valves (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Pipes
      • 2.2% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (14 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Operation
    • 9.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.5% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.2% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 2.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 9.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.2% fail on Emissions
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.1% fail on Cap
  • 9.0% fail on Steering
    • 9.0% fail on Steering system
      • 5.6% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Track rod end
  • 9.0% fail on Tyres
    • 7.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.1% fail on Size/type
    • 1.1% fail on Condition
  • 6.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 4.5% fail on Doors (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Passengers other (11 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Body condition
  • 6.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 3.4% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.1% fail on Requirements
    • 2.2% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 2.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp

Search Good Garages