Volvo V40 MOT Results
Registered in 199623.1% pass rate
from 26 tests in 2021
(75% worse than other 1996 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Volvo V40 is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Brakes
-
27% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
19% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 19% fail on Rbt (sp) (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
12% fail on
Service brake performance
(3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
12% fail on
Rbt
(3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 7.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 3.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
12% fail on
Rbt
(3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
7.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 7.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
7.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
19% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.8% fail on Brake pads
-
3.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
27% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
27% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
12% fail on
Headlamps
- 12% fail on Headlamp (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 7.7% fail on Headlamp aim
-
7.7% fail on
Electrical equipment
(5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Battery(ies)
- 3.8% fail on Horn
- 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
12% fail on
Headlamps
-
27% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
27% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
27% fail on
Spark ignition
(3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 19% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 7.7% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
27% fail on
Spark ignition
(3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
27% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
23% fail on
Suspension
-
12% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 12% fail on Ball joint dust cover (94 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 7.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 3.8% fail on Wheel bearings
-
3.8% fail on
Springs
-
3.8% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.8% fail on Coil spring
-
3.8% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.8% fail on Shock absorbers
-
3.8% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 3.8% fail on Macpherson strut
-
3.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.8% fail on Pins and bushes
-
12% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
23% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 19% fail on Exhaust system (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Transmission
-
3.8% fail on
Drive shafts
- 3.8% fail on Joints
-
3.8% fail on
Prop shafts
- 3.8% fail on Joints
-
3.8% fail on
Drive shafts
-
19% fail on
Tyres
(5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 12% fail on Tread depth (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 7.7% fail on Size/type (48 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Condition
-
12% fail on
Steering
-
7.7% fail on
Steering gear
(5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 7.7% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 3.8% fail on Track rod end
-
7.7% fail on
Steering gear
(5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Visibility
- 3.8% fail on Wipers