Toyota Celica MOT Results

Registered in 1999

60.6% pass rate

from 485 tests in 2021

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Toyota Celica is unusually good or bad.

15% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (83% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 15% fail on Exhaust emissions (92% worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 15% fail on Spark ignition (99% worse than other 1999 cars)
    - 12% fail on Catalyst emissions (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
    - 2.1% fail on Emissions not tested
    - 0.41% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    - 0.21% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.21% fail on Catalytic converter
    - 0.21% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  - 0.41% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.41% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.41% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.41% fail on Engine oil leaks
14% fail on Brakes
- 8.9% fail on Brake performance
  - 5.6% fail on Service brake performance (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
    - 5.6% fail on Rbt (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
      - 4.9% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
      - 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 3.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 3.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 2.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
  - 1.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 1.2% fail on Rbt
      - 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      - 0.21% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
  - 1.0% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 4.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 1.2% fail on Brake pads
  - 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 1.2% fail on Brake discs
- 1.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 1.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.62% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.41% fail on Pedal
  - 0.21% fail on Hand lever
- 0.41% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.21% fail on Reservoirs
  - 0.21% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.21% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.21% fail on Lever
- 0.21% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.21% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.21% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.7% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 2.1% fail on Headlamps
  - 1.6% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.21% fail on Dipswitch
  - 0.21% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 1.6% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 1.4% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.21% fail on Electrical wiring
  - 0.21% fail on Horn
- 1.2% fail on Direction indicators
  - 1.2% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.62% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 0.62% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.62% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.62% fail on Position lamp
12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 4.7% fail on Exhaust system
- 3.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 2.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
  - 0.21% fail on Sub-frame
    - 0.21% fail on Sub-frame condition
- 2.9% fail on Transmission
  - 2.7% fail on Drive shafts
    - 2.7% fail on Joints
  - 0.21% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.21% fail on Joints
- 1.4% fail on Chassis
  - 1.4% fail on Chassis condition
- 1.0% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.62% fail on Tank (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.21% fail on Pipe
  - 0.21% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.21% fail on Spare wheel
  - 0.21% fail on Carrier
- 0.21% fail on Floor
11% fail on Suspension
- 5.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 2.5% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 1.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 0.62% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.21% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 1.4% fail on Springs
  - 1.2% fail on Coil springs
    - 1.2% fail on Coil spring
  - 0.21% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
- 1.0% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.62% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  - 0.41% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.82% fail on Suspension arms (81% better than other 1999 cars)
  - 0.41% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.41% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.21% fail on Ball joint
- 0.62% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.21% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.21% fail on Pins and bushes
7.0% fail on Visibility
- 3.9% fail on Wipers
- 3.1% fail on Washers
- 0.21% fail on Bonnet
4.1% fail on Tyres
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 2.1% fail on Tread depth
- 0.21% fail on Size/type
2.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 2.1% fail on Seat belts
  - 1.0% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 0.82% fail on Condition
  - 0.41% fail on Attachment (18 times worse than other 1999 cars)
1.0% fail on Steering (72% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Steering gear
  - 0.41% fail on Steering rack
- 0.41% fail on Power steering
  - 0.21% fail on Pipes and hoses
  - 0.21% fail on Pump
- 0.21% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 0.21% fail on Track rod end
0.82% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.82% fail on Registration plates
0.41% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.41% fail on Attachment