Subaru Outback MOT Results

Registered in 2009
58.8% pass rate
from 444 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Subaru Outback is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 9.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Pins and bushes (27 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.68% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.45% fail on Linkage
      • 0.45% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 6.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.6% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.23% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Springs (80% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Coil springs (80% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Coil spring (80% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.68% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.23% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.23% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim (75% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp levelling device (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.68% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (34 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.68% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.68% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.68% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.45% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.45% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 9.2% fail on Brakes
    • 4.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.0% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.90% fail on Brake performance not tested (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.45% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.23% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.23% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.23% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.23% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.23% fail on Rbt
          • 0.23% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 1.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.6% fail on Electronic stability control (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.68% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.68% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.23% fail on Lever
      • 0.23% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.23% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.23% fail on Operation
    • 0.23% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.23% fail on Brake fluid
  • 8.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (82% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Transmission (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Drive shafts (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.7% fail on Joints (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.23% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.23% fail on Joints
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.68% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.23% fail on Tank
      • 0.23% fail on Hose
      • 0.23% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.23% fail on Doors
      • 0.23% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.23% fail on Door condition
  • 5.4% fail on Visibility
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.45% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.68% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.45% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.23% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 2.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.45% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.45% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 2.7% fail on Tyres (56% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.90% fail on Condition (69% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Size/type
  • 0.90% fail on Steering
    • 0.45% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.45% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.23% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.23% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.23% fail on Power steering
      • 0.23% fail on Other components
  • 0.23% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.23% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.23% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.23% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages