Renault Twingo MOT Results

Registered in 2013
65.2% pass rate
from 1,039 tests in 2021
(30% worse than other 2013 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2013 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Twingo is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension (120% worse than other 2013 cars)
    • 10% fail on Springs (180% worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 10% fail on Coil springs (180% worse than other 2013 cars)
        • 10% fail on Coil spring (180% worse than other 2013 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Mounting (11 times worse than other 2013 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Suspension arms (79% worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.096% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage (26 times worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (37 times worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 0.67% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.38% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (8 times worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.096% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.38% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.096% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.096% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 9.9% fail on Brakes (93% worse than other 2013 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Brake performance (78% worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2013 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt (170% worse than other 2013 cars)
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2013 cars)
          • 0.87% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.67% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.58% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.096% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.096% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.096% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.096% fail on Rbt
          • 0.096% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.096% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.096% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 3.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (10 times worse than other 2013 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums (98% worse than other 2013 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs (99% worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.096% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.096% fail on Lever
    • 0.29% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.19% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.096% fail on Pedal
    • 0.19% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.19% fail on Lever
    • 0.19% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.19% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.19% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.096% fail on Size/type
  • 4.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (41% better than other 2013 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.96% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.77% fail on Stop lamp (59% better than other 2013 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Headlamps (68% better than other 2013 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Headlamp (66% better than other 2013 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Electrical equipment (2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.29% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.29% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.19% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.096% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.19% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.19% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.096% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.096% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 4.5% fail on Visibility
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 1.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.19% fail on View to rear
      • 0.096% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.096% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 1.7% fail on Steering
    • 1.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.19% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.19% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.096% fail on Steering play
      • 0.096% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.096% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 1.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.48% fail on Transmission
      • 0.48% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.48% fail on Joints
    • 0.29% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.19% fail on Body
      • 0.096% fail on Body condition
      • 0.096% fail on Other body component
    • 0.096% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.096% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.096% fail on Seats
      • 0.096% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 0.77% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.38% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.38% fail on Condition
    • 0.38% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.67% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (61% better than other 2013 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.67% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.58% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.19% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.29% fail on Condition
  • 0.19% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.19% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages