Mitsubishi Canter MOT Results

Registered in 2001
58.7% pass rate
from 63 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2001 cars and highlighted areas where the Mitsubishi Canter is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 6.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.8% fail on Side repeaters (5 times worse than other 2001 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 6.3% fail on Electrical equipment (6 times worse than other 2001 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Horn (12 times worse than other 2001 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 4.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 4.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.6% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.6% fail on Switch
    • 1.6% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 9.5% fail on Service brake performance (200% worse than other 2001 cars)
        • 9.5% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2001 cars)
          • 9.5% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2001 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 6.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 4.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 4.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt
          • 3.2% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.6% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.2% fail on Load sensing valves (11 times worse than other 2001 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
        • 1.6% fail on Brake drums
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 3.2% fail on Transmission
      • 3.2% fail on Prop shafts (16 times worse than other 2001 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Joints
        • 1.6% fail on Bearing housing
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.6% fail on Tank
    • 1.6% fail on Seats
      • 1.6% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 1.6% fail on Cabs
      • 1.6% fail on Steps
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
    • 3.2% fail on View to rear (10 times worse than other 2001 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Mirrors (10 times worse than other 2001 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
  • 6.3% fail on Suspension
    • 3.2% fail on Axles (14 times worse than other 2001 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on King pins (616 times worse than other 2001 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Springs
      • 1.6% fail on Leaf springs
        • 1.6% fail on Leaf spring
    • 1.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 6.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 6.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 6.3% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2001 cars)
  • 4.8% fail on Steering
    • 4.8% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.6% fail on Drag link end
  • 4.8% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.6% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 1.6% fail on Other leaks
  • 1.6% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plates
    • 1.6% fail on Vehicle Identification Number

Search Good Garages