MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Hyundai » i30 » 2010

Hyundai i30 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
57.4% pass rate
from 11,813 tests in 2021
(18% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Hyundai i30 is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.1% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamps (64% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.017% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.61% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (93% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Direction indicators (26% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Flashing type (26% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Side repeaters (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.093% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.45% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.40% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Horn (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0085% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.0085% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.14% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp (78% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0085% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.0085% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 0.13% fail on Reversing lamps (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Reversing lamps (51% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.085% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.076% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.0085% fail on Switch
    • 0.0085% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.0085% fail on Switch
  • 17% fail on Suspension (26% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (29% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Ball joint dust cover (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.068% fail on Linkage (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 5.3% fail on Springs
      • 5.3% fail on Coil springs
        • 5.3% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.017% fail on Mounting
      • 0.0085% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.7% fail on Suspension arms (14% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint (24% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Suspension arm (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Pins and bushes (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Other suspension component (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint dust cover (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0085% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.24% fail on Wheel bearings (57% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Shock absorbers (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.10% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.017% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.0085% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.068% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.034% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.034% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0085% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.059% fail on Macpherson strut (64% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.0085% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0085% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.042% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 12% fail on Brakes (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Brake performance (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 3.9% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.74% fail on Service brake imbalance (90% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.0085% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.034% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.034% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.017% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0085% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.0085% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 4.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.19% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.068% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.059% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.042% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.0085% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0085% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0085% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.60% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.58% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.28% fail on Service brake performance (67% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0085% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.0085% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.0085% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (34% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Brake pads (34% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.9% fail on Brake discs and drums (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Brake discs (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0085% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.14% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.093% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.025% fail on Cable
        • 0.0085% fail on Linkage
        • 0.0085% fail on Pivot
        • 0.0085% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake control (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Pedal
    • 0.37% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (36% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.19% fail on Anti-lock braking system (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.093% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.017% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.0085% fail on Valves
    • 0.042% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.0085% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.025% fail on Rigid brake pipes (97% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Flexible brake hoses (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0085% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0085% fail on Operation
    • 0.0085% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.0085% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.0085% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 6.9% fail on Tyres (14% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth (20% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
  • 5.5% fail on Visibility
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.11% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.093% fail on View to rear
      • 0.093% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.085% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.085% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.025% fail on Driver's view
  • 3.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.5% fail on Doors (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Front passenger's door (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.97% fail on Door condition (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0085% fail on Catch
      • 0.37% fail on Other passenger's door (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Door condition (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Driver's door (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system (22% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Transmission (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Drive shafts (83% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Joints (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.20% fail on Tank (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0085% fail on Pipe
    • 0.13% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.042% fail on Body
      • 0.034% fail on Other body component
      • 0.0085% fail on Body condition
    • 0.034% fail on Towbar (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Towbar condition (38 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Seats
      • 0.017% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.0085% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.017% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.0085% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.0085% fail on Sub-frame condition
      • 0.0085% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.017% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.017% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.0085% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.0085% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 2.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (31% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (30% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.2% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (90% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (77% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.059% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.025% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.017% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.92% fail on Spark ignition (55% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Catalyst emissions (65% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (67% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.017% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.13% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.0085% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.0085% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.0085% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.0085% fail on Undertray
  • 1.9% fail on Steering (19% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Steering linkage components (24% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end (29% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.042% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.025% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0085% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.0085% fail on Other components
        • 0.0085% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.25% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.24% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.0085% fail on Operation
    • 0.12% fail on Steering play (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Steering rack (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.051% fail on Steering column (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.025% fail on Electronic power steering
    • 0.017% fail on Power steering (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0085% fail on Operation
      • 0.0085% fail on Other components
    • 0.017% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.0085% fail on Flexible coupling
      • 0.0085% fail on Universal joint
  • 0.41% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (55% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.25% fail on Condition
      • 0.034% fail on Attachment
      • 0.0085% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.0085% fail on Requirements
    • 0.13% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (73% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.32% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.32% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.30% fail on Road Wheels (34% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Attachment
    • 0.025% fail on Condition (78% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.017% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.017% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages