Ford Mustang MOT Results

Registered in 2015
83.9% pass rate
from 434 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Ford Mustang is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.0% fail on Brakes (70% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Brake performance (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.69% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (52 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance (10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance (10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.23% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (8 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (8 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.92% fail on Service brake performance (17 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.69% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.69% fail on Rbt
          • 0.69% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.69% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.46% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.46% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.23% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.23% fail on Brake discs
  • 3.7% fail on Visibility
    • 2.5% fail on Washers
    • 1.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.23% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.23% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.23% fail on Window
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Condition
  • 2.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 0.92% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.92% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.69% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.23% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.46% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.46% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.46% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.23% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.46% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.46% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.23% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.23% fail on Horn
    • 0.23% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.23% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.23% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 1.6% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.23% fail on Intermediate drop arm
      • 0.23% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.23% fail on Power steering
      • 0.23% fail on Operation
    • 0.23% fail on Steering column
  • 1.6% fail on Suspension
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.23% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.23% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 0.92% fail on Identification of the vehicle (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Registration plates (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
  • 0.92% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.92% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.92% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.46% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.46% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.46% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.46% fail on Exhaust system
  • 0.23% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.23% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.23% fail on Requirements
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages