FIAT Multipla MOT Results

Registered in 2005

46.9% pass rate

from 209 tests in 2021

(25% worse than other 2005 cars)

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the FIAT Multipla is unusually good or bad.

29% fail on Suspension (66% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 13% fail on Suspension arms (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 8.6% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 4.8% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.48% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 13% fail on Anti-roll bars (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 6.2% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 2.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 1.9% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.96% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.48% fail on Linkage
- 2.9% fail on Springs
  - 2.9% fail on Coil springs
    - 2.4% fail on Coil spring
    - 0.48% fail on Mounting
- 2.9% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Sub-frame (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.96% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.48% fail on Axles
  - 0.48% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 0.48% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.48% fail on Pins and bushes
17% fail on Brakes
- 12% fail on Brake performance (68% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 5.3% fail on Service brake performance
    - 5.3% fail on Rbt
      - 4.8% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.48% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 4.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 4.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 3.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 3.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      - 3.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      - 0.48% fail on Service brake performance
  - 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 2.4% fail on Rbt
      - 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
  - 0.96% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 4.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 2.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 2.4% fail on Brake discs
  - 1.4% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 1.4% fail on Cable (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.96% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 0.96% fail on Brake pads
- 1.4% fail on Parking brake control
  - 1.4% fail on Lever
- 1.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.96% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.48% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.48% fail on Hand lever
- 0.48% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.48% fail on Valves
- 0.48% fail on Rigid brake pipes
16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.3% fail on Headlamps
  - 5.3% fail on Headlamp
- 4.8% fail on Direction indicators
  - 4.8% fail on Flashing type
    - 3.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 2.4% fail on Side repeaters
- 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.48% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.48% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.48% fail on Horn
14% fail on Body, chassis, structure (70% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 8.6% fail on Transmission (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 8.1% fail on Drive shafts (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 8.1% fail on Joints (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.48% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.48% fail on Joints
- 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 0.96% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
  - 0.48% fail on Sub-frame
    - 0.48% fail on Sub-frame condition
- 1.4% fail on Doors
  - 1.4% fail on Driver's door (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 1.4% fail on Door condition (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.48% fail on Front passenger's door
    - 0.48% fail on Door condition
- 0.96% fail on Chassis
  - 0.96% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.48% fail on Bumpers
- 0.48% fail on Seats
  - 0.48% fail on Passenger's seat
10% fail on Tyres
- 6.2% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Tread depth
- 0.96% fail on Size/type
7.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Seat belts
  - 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 1.4% fail on Condition
7.2% fail on Steering
- 6.7% fail on Steering linkage components (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 6.7% fail on Track rod end (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Power steering
  - 0.96% fail on Other components (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Steering gear
  - 0.48% fail on Steering rack
6.2% fail on Visibility
- 5.3% fail on Wipers
- 0.96% fail on Washers
6.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 6.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 3.3% fail on Spark ignition
    - 2.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  - 3.3% fail on Compression ignition
    - 1.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    - 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.48% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    - 0.48% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.48% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.48% fail on Other leaks
0.48% fail on Seat belt installation check
- 0.48% fail on Belt(s)/padding