Daihatsu Terios MOT Results

Registered in 2009
73.2% pass rate
from 609 tests in 2021
(33% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Terios is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.7% fail on Brakes
    • 5.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.99% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.66% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.82% fail on Rbt
          • 0.82% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.49% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.49% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 3.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.66% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.66% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.33% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.33% fail on Cable
    • 0.16% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.16% fail on Lever
    • 0.16% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.16% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.16% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 6.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (48% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.99% fail on Headlamp aim (69% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Headlamp aim (65% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Headlamps (90% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Headlamp (89% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (83% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.16% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.16% fail on Horn
  • 6.2% fail on Suspension (57% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.66% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (58% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.49% fail on Springs (91% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Coil springs (91% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.49% fail on Coil spring (91% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.33% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.16% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.16% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 4.8% fail on Visibility
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.82% fail on Washers (73% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.16% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.82% fail on Integral vehicle structure (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Chassis
      • 0.16% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.16% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.16% fail on Pipe
    • 0.16% fail on Transmission
      • 0.16% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.16% fail on Joints
    • 0.16% fail on Body
      • 0.16% fail on Other body component
  • 2.5% fail on Steering
    • 2.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.5% fail on Track rod end
  • 2.5% fail on Tyres (60% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.49% fail on Condition (83% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.66% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.66% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.66% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.66% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (85% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Exhaust emissions (84% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Spark ignition (76% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.16% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.16% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.16% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages