Daewoo Matiz MOT Results

Registered in 2002
45.4% pass rate
from 335 tests in 2021
(24% worse than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Daewoo Matiz is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Suspension (39% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 13% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.7% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.2% fail on Suspension arm
    • 3.3% fail on Wheel bearings (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.60% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.30% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.60% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 22% fail on Brakes (58% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 18% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 14% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 14% fail on Rbt (sp) (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 13% fail on Service brake imbalance (8 times worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
      • 6.9% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 6.9% fail on Rbt (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 5.4% fail on Service brake performance (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.90% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.90% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (77% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.90% fail on Rbt (sp) (75% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt
          • 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 4.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.7% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Pedal (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.30% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.30% fail on Brake discs
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 10% fail on Headlamps (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.6% fail on Headlamp (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 6.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.90% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.90% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.90% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.60% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.60% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.30% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.30% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.60% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.30% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.30% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.30% fail on Position lamp
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure (71% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 9.6% fail on Exhaust system (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Seats (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Driver's seat (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Chassis
      • 1.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.90% fail on Transmission (75% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Drive shafts (74% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Joints (82% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Bearing housing
    • 0.60% fail on Engine mounting (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Engine mounting condition (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.30% fail on Tank
    • 0.30% fail on Doors
      • 0.30% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.30% fail on Door condition
    • 0.30% fail on Floor
  • 13% fail on Visibility (56% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Wipers
    • 5.4% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on Bonnet (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (63% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions (74% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 11% fail on Spark ignition (86% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 5.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 3.6% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.60% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.30% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.30% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 10% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Seat belts (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
  • 7.5% fail on Tyres
    • 4.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.30% fail on Size/type
  • 6.3% fail on Steering
    • 3.6% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.0% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.30% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.30% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.30% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.30% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages