MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chrysler » Voyager » 2005

Chrysler Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 2005
48.5% pass rate
from 400 tests in 2021
(20% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Brakes (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 18% fail on Brake performance (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 13% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 13% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Parking brake performance (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.5% fail on Rbt (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 3.8% fail on Parking brake performance (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.75% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt
          • 4.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.50% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.75% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.50% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 8.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 8.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.50% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.50% fail on Cable
    • 1.0% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.50% fail on Pedal
      • 0.50% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.75% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.75% fail on Lever
    • 0.50% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.25% fail on Brake fluid
  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (39% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.25% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 6.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.8% fail on Direction indicators (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Flashing type (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 2.3% fail on Side repeaters (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.3% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Horn
    • 0.50% fail on Hazard warning (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (15 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.25% fail on Position lamp
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 8.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (60% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.8% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.75% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint
    • 5.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.8% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.50% fail on Suspension arm
    • 4.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.50% fail on Springs (89% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.25% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
      • 0.25% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.50% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.50% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.50% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.25% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.50% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.25% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 10% fail on Visibility
    • 6.5% fail on Wipers (72% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.50% fail on View to rear
      • 0.50% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.25% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.25% fail on Windscreen
  • 9.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.0% fail on Transmission
      • 3.8% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.8% fail on Joints
      • 0.25% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.25% fail on Joints
    • 2.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.75% fail on Engine mounting (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Engine mounting condition (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.50% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.50% fail on Doors
      • 0.25% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.25% fail on Door condition
      • 0.25% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.25% fail on Door condition
    • 0.25% fail on Chassis
      • 0.25% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.25% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.25% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.25% fail on Towbar
      • 0.25% fail on Safety device
    • 0.25% fail on Body
      • 0.25% fail on Other body component
    • 0.25% fail on Seats
      • 0.25% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 7.0% fail on Steering (78% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.75% fail on Drag link end (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.3% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Power steering (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Other components (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Operation
      • 0.50% fail on Rams (30 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Steering play
      • 0.50% fail on Steering rack
  • 6.8% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.5% fail on Condition
  • 5.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.5% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.75% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.25% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 2.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.50% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.25% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.25% fail on Oxygen sensor
        • 0.25% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.25% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.75% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.50% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.25% fail on Other leaks
  • 5.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.50% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.50% fail on Condition
  • 2.3% fail on Road Wheels (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Condition
  • 1.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages