MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chrysler » Grand Voyager » 1999

Chrysler Grand Voyager MOT Results

Registered in 1999
58.5% pass rate
from 53 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler Grand Voyager is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Brakes (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 23% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 13% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 13% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 11% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 7.5% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.8% fail on Rbt
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 15% fail on Headlamps (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 15% fail on Headlamp (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.9% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 1.9% fail on Horn
    • 1.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.9% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.9% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.9% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 3.8% fail on Macpherson strut (20 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Macpherson strut (79 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.9% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.9% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.9% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 3.8% fail on Body (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Panel (26 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Chassis
      • 1.9% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.9% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.9% fail on Pipe
    • 1.9% fail on Transmission
      • 1.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.9% fail on Joints
  • 5.7% fail on Steering
    • 3.8% fail on Steering gear
      • 3.8% fail on Steering rack
    • 3.8% fail on Power steering (8 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Operation
      • 1.9% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 5.7% fail on Visibility
    • 1.9% fail on Condition of glass
      • 1.9% fail on Windscreen
    • 1.9% fail on View to rear
      • 1.9% fail on Mirrors
    • 1.9% fail on Wipers
  • 3.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 1.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.9% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.9% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.9% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages