MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chrysler » 300C » 2010

Chrysler 300C MOT Results

Registered in 2010
59.0% pass rate
from 83 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler 300C is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Brakes (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 18% fail on Brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 17% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 17% fail on Rbt (sp) (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Parking brake performance (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.8% fail on Rbt (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 4.8% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
    • 2.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 2.4% fail on Electronic stability control (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.2% fail on Lever
    • 1.2% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 9.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.8% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 4.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage
  • 9.6% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.2% fail on Horn
  • 8.4% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.4% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.2% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
  • 6.0% fail on Tyres
    • 4.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.2% fail on Condition
  • 3.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.4% fail on Fuel system (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (16 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Doors
      • 1.2% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 1.2% fail on Door condition
    • 1.2% fail on Undertray
  • 2.4% fail on Visibility
    • 2.4% fail on Wipers
  • 2.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.4% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 2.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.4% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.2% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 1.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.2% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.2% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages