Peugeot 407 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
65.8% pass rate
from 1,706 tests in 2017
(17% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 407 is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Position lamps (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Front lamps (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.3% fail on Stop lamp (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamps (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.059% fail on Matched pair
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.41% fail on Direction indicators (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Flashing type (73% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Individual lamps (65% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.059% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.059% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.23% fail on Horn
    • 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.059% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.059% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.059% fail on Fog lamp
  • 10.0% fail on Suspension (23% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Drive shafts (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Front drive shafts (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Constant velocity joints (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.059% fail on Couplings
      • 0.12% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Drive shafts (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.059% fail on Attachment
    • 1.6% fail on Front suspension joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.94% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.35% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.059% fail on Condition
    • 0.29% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.23% fail on Front
      • 0.059% fail on Rear
    • 0.23% fail on Coil springs (93% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Condition (93% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Shock absorbers (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Condition (89% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.059% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.059% fail on Condition
    • 0.059% fail on Axles
      • 0.059% fail on Swivel joints/housing
  • 6.6% fail on Tyres
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.23% fail on Size/type
    • 0.059% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.4% fail on Brakes
    • 2.9% fail on Hub components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.41% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.88% fail on Brake performance (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.35% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.18% fail on Parking brake performance (77% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.47% fail on Components
        • 0.41% fail on Hoses (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.059% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.18% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on ABS
    • 0.12% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.059% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.059% fail on Pedal
        • 0.059% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.059% fail on Restricted movement
  • 3.3% fail on Driver's view of the road (30% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.94% fail on Wipers (64% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.23% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.059% fail on Bonnet
  • 0.88% fail on Steering
    • 0.82% fail on Steering system
      • 0.35% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.29% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Steering arm (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.059% fail on Power steering
      • 0.059% fail on Operation
      • 0.059% fail on Other components
  • 0.70% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.53% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
      • 0.12% fail on Requirements (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas (20 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.18% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.59% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.47% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Passengers front (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Drivers
      • 0.059% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.12% fail on Seats
      • 0.059% fail on Passengers
      • 0.059% fail on Drivers
  • 0.53% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.29% fail on Attachment
    • 0.23% fail on Condition
  • 0.53% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.53% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.18% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (88% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.059% fail on Emissions

Search Good Garages