Peugeot 407 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
59.1% pass rate
from 1,887 tests in 2020
(21% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 407 is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Stop lamp (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamps (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Headlamp (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.7% fail on Position lamps (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Position lamp (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.64% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Direction indicators (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Flashing type (60% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Individual direction indicators (53% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.42% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.16% fail on Electrical wiring (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Horn
      • 0.053% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.053% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.16% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.16% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.16% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.6% fail on Transmission (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 9.4% fail on Drive shafts (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 9.3% fail on Joints (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.053% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.32% fail on Prop shafts (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Joints (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Exhaust system (84% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Undertray (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.053% fail on Pipe
      • 0.053% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.053% fail on System
    • 0.16% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.16% fail on Towbar (35 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Towbar condition (86 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.16% fail on Doors
      • 0.11% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
      • 0.053% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.053% fail on Door condition
    • 0.16% fail on Seats
      • 0.16% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.053% fail on Body
      • 0.053% fail on Panel
  • 7.0% fail on Brakes
    • 4.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (41% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (58% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Brake pads (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.69% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.69% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.32% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.26% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.053% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.053% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.37% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Brake fluid (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.21% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.21% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.16% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.16% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.16% fail on Pedal
    • 0.16% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.11% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 6.8% fail on Suspension (37% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.053% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.21% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.053% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.95% fail on Other suspension component (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Ball joint (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.053% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.42% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.37% fail on Springs (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Coil springs (90% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Coil spring (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Shock absorbers (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Axles
      • 0.11% fail on Swivel joints/housing (101 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.053% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.053% fail on Ball joint
  • 6.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.16% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.053% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.053% fail on Particulate filter
      • 0.58% fail on Spark ignition (61% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.21% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Engine oil leaks
    • 0.11% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.11% fail on Undertray (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 5.9% fail on Visibility
    • 4.5% fail on Washers (95% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Wipers (45% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.11% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.11% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.11% fail on View to rear
      • 0.11% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.9% fail on Tyres
    • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.21% fail on Size/type
  • 1.9% fail on Steering
    • 1.3% fail on Steering gear (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Steering linkage components (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Track rod end (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.053% fail on Power steering
      • 0.053% fail on Pump
    • 0.053% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.053% fail on Steering play
      • 0.053% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.58% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.37% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.32% fail on Condition
      • 0.11% fail on Requirements (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.53% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.53% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.53% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.53% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages