MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 407 » 2010

Peugeot 407 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
56.6% pass rate
from 1,595 tests in 2021
(17% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 407 is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (53% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Stop lamp (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamps (85% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Headlamp (89% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp levelling device (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.50% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.94% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.50% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.69% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.69% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.69% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.44% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.19% fail on Horn
      • 0.13% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.063% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.063% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.19% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.19% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.13% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.13% fail on Position lamp
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 12% fail on Transmission (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 12% fail on Drive shafts (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 12% fail on Joints (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.25% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Belts
    • 0.38% fail on Exhaust system (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Undertray (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.063% fail on Tank
      • 0.063% fail on Hose
      • 0.063% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.19% fail on Doors
      • 0.19% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.19% fail on Door condition
    • 0.063% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.063% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.063% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.063% fail on Body
      • 0.063% fail on Other body component
    • 0.063% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.063% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 9.3% fail on Suspension (30% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.38% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage ball joints (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.3% fail on Springs (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Coil springs (76% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Coil spring (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Other suspension component (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Ball joint (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.50% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.44% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.13% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 8.5% fail on Brakes
    • 5.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (73% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Brake pads (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.44% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.44% fail on Rbt
          • 0.31% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.31% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.31% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.063% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.82% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.63% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.38% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.063% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.31% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Brake fluid (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.25% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.19% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.13% fail on Pedal
      • 0.063% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.19% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.063% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.063% fail on Lever
    • 0.063% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 7.6% fail on Visibility (43% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Washers (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.19% fail on View to rear
      • 0.19% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.13% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.13% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.6% fail on Tyres
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth (39% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Condition
  • 6.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (76% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.75% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.25% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.13% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.063% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
      • 0.63% fail on Spark ignition (69% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.56% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.063% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.31% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.19% fail on Other leaks (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Engine oil leaks
    • 0.13% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.063% fail on Sound deadening material
      • 0.063% fail on Undertray
  • 2.7% fail on Steering
    • 2.2% fail on Steering gear (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Steering linkage components (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Track rod end (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.063% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.063% fail on Power steering
      • 0.063% fail on Operation
    • 0.063% fail on Steering column
    • 0.063% fail on Steering play
      • 0.063% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.94% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.56% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.31% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.25% fail on Condition
      • 0.063% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.063% fail on Airbags
      • 0.063% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.82% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.63% fail on Attachment
    • 0.25% fail on Condition
  • 0.50% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.50% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.063% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.063% fail on Anchorages

Search Good Garages