Peugeot 407 MOT Results

Registered in 2009
56.0% pass rate
from 1,967 tests in 2021
(14% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 407 is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (45% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Stop lamp (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamps (71% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Headlamp (75% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.51% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.51% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.56% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.56% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.56% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.36% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.15% fail on Horn
      • 0.10% fail on Trailer electrical socket (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.051% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.15% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.10% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.10% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.051% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.051% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 11% fail on Transmission (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 11% fail on Drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 11% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Prop shafts (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on Joints (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Seats (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Driver's seat (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Passenger's seat (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Exhaust system (82% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Doors
      • 0.25% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.25% fail on Door condition
      • 0.051% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.051% fail on Door condition
    • 0.25% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.20% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.051% fail on Pipe
    • 0.15% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.10% fail on Body
      • 0.10% fail on Other body component
    • 0.10% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.051% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.051% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.10% fail on Undertray
    • 0.051% fail on Towbar
      • 0.051% fail on Towbar condition
  • 10.0% fail on Suspension (32% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.8% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.10% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.051% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joints (55% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.36% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (72% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.051% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.051% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.051% fail on Linkage
    • 1.9% fail on Springs (67% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Coil springs (67% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Coil spring (67% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.25% fail on Shock absorbers (71% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 8.4% fail on Brakes
    • 4.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.10% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.051% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 0.76% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.71% fail on Rbt
          • 0.66% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.051% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.051% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.051% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.15% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (75% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Rbt (sp) (74% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.10% fail on Service brake imbalance (80% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.051% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.10% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (36% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (41% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Brake pads (43% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.051% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.56% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.56% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.10% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.36% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.31% fail on Pedal
      • 0.051% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.25% fail on Brake fluid (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.051% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.051% fail on Lever
    • 0.051% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.051% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 7.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
  • 7.0% fail on Visibility
    • 5.3% fail on Washers (76% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Wipers (52% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.20% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.20% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.051% fail on View to rear
      • 0.051% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (30% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (32% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (88% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.25% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.051% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.051% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
      • 0.76% fail on Spark ignition (72% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.71% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.051% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.10% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.051% fail on Sound deadening material
      • 0.051% fail on Undertray
    • 0.10% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.051% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.051% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 2.3% fail on Steering
    • 1.2% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Steering linkage components (65% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Track rod end (71% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.10% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.36% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Pipes and hoses (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Other components
    • 0.051% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.051% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 1.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.51% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
      • 0.10% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.51% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.0% fail on Road Wheels (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.92% fail on Attachment (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Condition
  • 0.66% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.66% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages