Peugeot 407 MOT Results

Registered in 2009
62.9% pass rate
from 2,327 tests in 2017
(14% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 407 is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (56% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 9.0% fail on Registration plate lamp (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Position lamps (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.0% fail on Front lamps (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Rear lamps
    • 7.0% fail on Stop lamp (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamps (92% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp (99% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.95% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.95% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.69% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters (76% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.043% fail on Switch
    • 0.34% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.34% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.043% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.086% fail on Horn
    • 0.043% fail on Battery
    • 0.043% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 6.3% fail on Drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Front drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 6.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.043% fail on Couplings
        • 0.043% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.13% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Drive shafts (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.39% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.043% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.5% fail on Front suspension joints (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.043% fail on Attachment
    • 0.60% fail on Coil springs (85% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Condition (85% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Shock absorbers (52% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Condition (52% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.17% fail on Rear
      • 0.13% fail on Front
    • 0.086% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.086% fail on Condition
    • 0.043% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.043% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.043% fail on Axles
      • 0.043% fail on Swivel joints/housing
  • 7.0% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Condition
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.17% fail on Size/type
    • 0.043% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.5% fail on Brakes
    • 4.2% fail on Hub components (49% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Brake pads (62% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.043% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.043% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.8% fail on Brake performance (37% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.64% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.39% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.086% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.086% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.043% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.043% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.39% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.30% fail on Components
        • 0.26% fail on Hoses
        • 0.043% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.043% fail on Operation
      • 0.043% fail on Leaks
    • 0.39% fail on ABS
    • 0.13% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.13% fail on Pedal
        • 0.13% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.086% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.086% fail on Parking brake (80% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.043% fail on Restricted movement
  • 5.2% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.0% fail on Washers (86% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Wipers (71% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.043% fail on Mirrors
  • 0.95% fail on Steering
    • 0.73% fail on Steering system
      • 0.30% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.21% fail on Track rod end (72% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.043% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.043% fail on Other components
        • 0.043% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.21% fail on Power steering
      • 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Operation
      • 0.043% fail on Pump
  • 0.77% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.77% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.73% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.47% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.43% fail on Condition
      • 0.043% fail on Requirements
    • 0.30% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.30% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.52% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.30% fail on Doors
      • 0.17% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.086% fail on Body condition
    • 0.043% fail on Body security
    • 0.043% fail on Seats
      • 0.043% fail on Drivers
    • 0.043% fail on Load security
      • 0.043% fail on Tailgate
  • 0.47% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.47% fail on Attachment
  • 0.47% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (76% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Exhaust system (87% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.086% fail on System
      • 0.043% fail on Cap
    • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.086% fail on Emissions (85% better than other 2009 cars)

Search Good Garages