Rover CityRover MOT Results

Registered in 2004

47.4% pass rate

from 173 tests in 2021

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover CityRover is unusually good or bad.

27% fail on Suspension (53% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Suspension arms
  - 4.6% fail on Ball joint
  - 1.2% fail on Suspension arm
  - 0.58% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 0.58% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.58% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 6.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 4.0% fail on Linkage (9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
  - 1.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
  - 0.58% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 4.6% fail on Macpherson strut (19 times worse than other 2004 cars)
  - 4.0% fail on Macpherson strut (76 times worse than other 2004 cars)
  - 0.58% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 2.3% fail on Springs
  - 2.3% fail on Coil springs
    - 1.7% fail on Coil spring
    - 1.7% fail on Mounting (36 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.58% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.58% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
20% fail on Brakes
- 12% fail on Brake performance
  - 8.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    - 8.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      - 7.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      - 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
  - 5.8% fail on Service brake performance
    - 5.2% fail on Rbt
      - 4.0% fail on Service brake performance
      - 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.58% fail on Plate brake tester
      - 0.58% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 1.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 0.58% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.58% fail on Rbt
      - 0.58% fail on Parking brake performance
- 11% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 0.58% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 0.58% fail on Brake pads
  - 0.58% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.58% fail on Brake discs
- 0.58% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.58% fail on Brake fluid
18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
  - 5.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    - 5.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
- 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 4.0% fail on Headlamps
  - 3.5% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.58% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 3.5% fail on Direction indicators
  - 3.5% fail on Flashing type
    - 2.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 0.58% fail on Side repeaters
- 1.7% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (34 times worse than other 2004 cars)
  - 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (51 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.58% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.58% fail on Battery(ies)
14% fail on Visibility (76% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 8.7% fail on Washers (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Wipers
- 0.58% fail on Bonnet
- 0.58% fail on View to rear
  - 0.58% fail on Mirrors
13% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (75% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 12% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 12% fail on Spark ignition (100% worse than other 2004 cars)
    - 5.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 5.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
- 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 1.2% fail on Engine oil leaks
12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 6.9% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Chassis
  - 1.7% fail on Chassis condition
- 1.7% fail on Transmission
  - 1.7% fail on Drive shafts
    - 1.7% fail on Joints
- 1.7% fail on Doors
  - 1.2% fail on Front passenger's door (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    - 1.2% fail on Door condition (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
  - 0.58% fail on Other passenger's door
    - 0.58% fail on Door condition
- 1.2% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.58% fail on Pipe
  - 0.58% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.58% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 0.58% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.58% fail on Body
  - 0.58% fail on Other body component
8.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (180% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Seat belts
  - 2.3% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
  - 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 0.58% fail on Requirements
8.1% fail on Tyres
- 4.6% fail on Tread depth
- 4.0% fail on Condition
3.5% fail on Steering
- 1.2% fail on Steering gear
  - 1.2% fail on Steering rack
- 1.2% fail on Power steering
  - 1.2% fail on Pipes and hoses (11 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.58% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 0.58% fail on Ball joint
1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 1.2% fail on Registration plates
1.2% fail on Road Wheels
- 1.2% fail on Attachment