Peugeot Traveller MOT Results
Registered in 201778.2% pass rate
from 509 tests in 2021
(70% worse than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Traveller is unusually good or bad.
-
8.6% fail on
Visibility
(130% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 7.9% fail on Wipers (190% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Washers
-
4.7% fail on
Tyres
- 3.3% fail on Condition
- 1.8% fail on Tread depth
-
3.5% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
1.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.98% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.79% fail on Headlamp
-
0.20% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.20% fail on Position lamp
- 0.20% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.20% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.20% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
1.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
3.1% fail on
Brakes
-
2.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
-
0.59% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.59% fail on Brake discs
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.39% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Pedal (15 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.39% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.39% fail on
Rbt
- 0.39% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.39% fail on
Rbt
-
0.39% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.20% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.20% fail on Reservoirs
-
0.20% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.20% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.20% fail on Electronic stability control
-
2.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.6% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Transmission
(10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(11 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Joints (11 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(11 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Doors
-
0.20% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.20% fail on Door condition
-
0.20% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.20% fail on
Seats
- 0.20% fail on Passenger's seat
-
1.2% fail on
Transmission
(10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.79% fail on
Seat belts
(4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Seat belts
(4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.79% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.79% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.59% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.59% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.20% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.20% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.59% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.79% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.59% fail on
Suspension
-
0.20% fail on
Springs
-
0.20% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.20% fail on Coil spring
-
0.20% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.20% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.20% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.20% fail on
Springs
-
0.20% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.20% fail on Registration plates
-
0.20% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.20% fail on Belt(s)/padding