MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » RCZ » 2010

Peugeot RCZ MOT Results

Registered in 2010
61.8% pass rate
from 1,752 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot RCZ is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.0% fail on Stop lamp (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamps (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.40% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.17% fail on Direction indicators (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Flashing type (92% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Side repeaters (84% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.057% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.11% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp (80% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.057% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.057% fail on Horn
    • 0.057% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.057% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.057% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.057% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 9.5% fail on Springs (74% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 9.5% fail on Coil springs (75% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 9.5% fail on Coil spring (75% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Suspension arms (55% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (47% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Pins and bushes (48% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.97% fail on Anti-roll bars (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.46% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.46% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.23% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.057% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 8.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Spark ignition (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.057% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 1.9% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.5% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.057% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 0.91% fail on Fluid leaks (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Engine oil leaks (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Other leaks
  • 7.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (98% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Transmission (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 6.7% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Joints (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Exhaust system (63% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Seats
      • 0.057% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.057% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.057% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.057% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.057% fail on Body
      • 0.057% fail on Panel
    • 0.057% fail on Undertray
  • 6.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Size/type
  • 4.8% fail on Brakes (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.34% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Cable (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Brake performance (64% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Service brake performance (66% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Rbt (71% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake performance (66% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.68% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (62% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.68% fail on Rbt (sp) (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.17% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.057% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.11% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Rbt (85% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.057% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.057% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 0.63% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.46% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.34% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.057% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.17% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.057% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.057% fail on Lever
  • 4.7% fail on Visibility
    • 2.7% fail on Washers
    • 2.1% fail on Wipers
    • 0.11% fail on View to rear
      • 0.11% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.057% fail on Bonnet
  • 1.3% fail on Steering (45% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.057% fail on Other components
        • 0.057% fail on Steering component
  • 1.0% fail on Road Wheels (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Attachment (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Condition
  • 0.40% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.29% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.17% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
      • 0.057% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.23% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.23% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

  • Peugeot RCZ (2010 - 2015)
    A revelation on the road with superb handling, THP 200 engine is the pick of the range, available with HDi diesel.

    Search Good Garages