MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » RCZ » 2010

Peugeot RCZ MOT Results

Registered in 2010
64.1% pass rate
from 1,875 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot RCZ is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.6% fail on Stop lamp (55% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.43% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.27% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (42% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Position lamps (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Position lamp (55% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Direction indicators (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Flashing type (86% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Individual direction indicators (81% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.053% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.16% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.053% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.053% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 9.6% fail on Suspension
    • 8.3% fail on Springs (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 8.3% fail on Coil springs (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 8.2% fail on Coil spring (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.053% fail on Mounting
    • 0.85% fail on Anti-roll bars (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.053% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.053% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.053% fail on Linkage
    • 0.75% fail on Suspension arms (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.21% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.11% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.053% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.053% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.053% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 7.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Transmission (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 6.6% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Prop shafts (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Joints (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Exhaust system (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Seats
      • 0.21% fail on Driver's seat (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Doors
      • 0.11% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
    • 0.053% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.053% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.053% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.053% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.053% fail on Undertray
  • 7.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type
  • 6.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Spark ignition (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Catalyst emissions (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.053% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 1.9% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.3% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (93% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.053% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.75% fail on Fluid leaks (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Engine oil leaks (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.053% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.053% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 5.0% fail on Visibility
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.21% fail on View to rear
      • 0.21% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.16% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.16% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.053% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.4% fail on Brakes (39% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.053% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.053% fail on Lever
    • 1.2% fail on Brake performance (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Service brake performance (55% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.75% fail on Rbt (55% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.64% fail on Service brake performance (53% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.43% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (68% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Rbt (sp) (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.32% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.053% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.053% fail on Rbt
          • 0.053% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.43% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.37% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.21% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.053% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.16% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.11% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.053% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.053% fail on Lever
  • 1.1% fail on Steering
    • 1.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.0% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.053% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.053% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.053% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.80% fail on Road Wheels (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Attachment (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Condition
  • 0.59% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.59% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.37% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.21% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.16% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.16% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Peugeot RCZ (2010 - 2015)
    A revelation on the road with superb handling, THP 200 engine is the pick of the range, available with HDi diesel.

    Search Good Garages