Peugeot Partner Horizon MOT Results

Registered in 2016
84.5% pass rate
from 1,552 tests in 2020
(21% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Partner Horizon is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (93% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (54% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (53% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Stop lamp (200% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Position lamps (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Position lamp (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.64% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.39% fail on Individual direction indicators (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Side repeaters
  • 3.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Exhaust system (16 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Seats (44 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Passenger's seat (98 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Transmission (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Drive shafts (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on Joints (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Fuel system (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Tank (103 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Pipe (79 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Body (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Other body component (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Doors (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Other passenger's door (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.064% fail on Door condition
        • 0.064% fail on Catch
    • 0.064% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.064% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 2.4% fail on Visibility
    • 1.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.90% fail on Wipers (52% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.064% fail on View to rear
      • 0.064% fail on Mirrors
  • 1.9% fail on Brakes
    • 0.90% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.84% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.84% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.13% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.13% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.39% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Pedal (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.26% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.13% fail on Rbt
          • 0.064% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.064% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.26% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Anti-lock braking system (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 1.5% fail on Tyres (58% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Tread depth (66% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
    • 0.064% fail on Size/type
  • 0.90% fail on Suspension
    • 0.32% fail on Springs
      • 0.32% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.32% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.19% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.064% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.064% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.064% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.13% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.064% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.064% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.064% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 0.84% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.39% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.13% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.13% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.064% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.064% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.32% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.26% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.064% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.13% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Engine oil leaks (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.71% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.064% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.064% fail on Belt(s)/padding

Search Good Garages