MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » Partner Horizon » 2016

Peugeot Partner Horizon MOT Results

Registered in 2016
77.4% pass rate
from 1,497 tests in 2021
(35% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Partner Horizon is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Transmission (19 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Drive shafts (20 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Joints (20 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.067% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.13% fail on Prop shafts (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Joints (17 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust system (14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Seats (43 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Passenger's seat (77 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Driver's seat (24 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Other passenger's door (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.067% fail on Door condition
        • 0.067% fail on Catch
    • 0.13% fail on Boot lid (43 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Boot lid condition (53 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.067% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.067% fail on Tank
    • 0.067% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.067% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.067% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.067% fail on Undertray
  • 7.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (70% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (67% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.3% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamps (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Individual direction indicators (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.067% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.067% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.067% fail on Position lamp
  • 3.5% fail on Visibility
    • 1.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.067% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.067% fail on Windscreen
  • 2.8% fail on Suspension
    • 1.7% fail on Springs
      • 1.7% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.7% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.73% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.47% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.33% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.20% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.067% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.067% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.067% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.067% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.067% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.067% fail on Ball joint
  • 2.3% fail on Brakes
    • 1.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.80% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.80% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.33% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.33% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.53% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.53% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.53% fail on Rbt
          • 0.47% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.53% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Anti-lock braking system (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Electronic stability control (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Pedal (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.067% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.067% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 1.9% fail on Tyres (51% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Condition (49% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.94% fail on Tread depth (51% better than other 2016 cars)
  • 1.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.47% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Emission control equipment (48 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.067% fail on NOx sensor
          • 0.067% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.067% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.47% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.33% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.20% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 0.87% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Attachment
    • 0.20% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.067% fail on Steering
    • 0.067% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.067% fail on Track rod end

Search Good Garages