Peugeot Independance MOT Results

Registered in 2015
70.5% pass rate
from 688 tests in 2021
(52% worse than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot Independance is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (140% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim (96% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (89% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Stop lamp (150% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.58% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.58% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.44% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.15% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.44% fail on Hazard warning (100 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Switch (100 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.44% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.44% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.15% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.15% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 9.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Transmission (14 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Drive shafts (15 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 5.8% fail on Joints (15 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.15% fail on Joints
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust system (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Doors (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Other passenger's door (21 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Door condition (10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Catch (343 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.15% fail on Hose
      • 0.15% fail on System
    • 0.29% fail on Seats (9 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Passenger's seat (23 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.15% fail on Bracket
    • 0.15% fail on Body
      • 0.15% fail on Other body component
    • 0.15% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.15% fail on Other boot lid component
  • 6.8% fail on Visibility (75% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers (99% worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on View to rear (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Mirrors (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
  • 4.1% fail on Suspension
    • 2.0% fail on Suspension arms (110% worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.87% fail on Springs
      • 0.87% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.87% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.58% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.29% fail on Suspension rods (39 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Suspension rod (458 times worse than other 2015 cars)
  • 3.8% fail on Brakes
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.29% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.29% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.15% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.15% fail on Lever
    • 1.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.58% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.44% fail on Rbt
          • 0.29% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (17 times worse than other 2015 cars)
          • 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.15% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.58% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.58% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.29% fail on Rbt
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.15% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.15% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.87% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (6 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Pedal (14 times worse than other 2015 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.15% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.15% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 3.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Condition
  • 1.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.58% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.15% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.44% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.29% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.15% fail on Steering
    • 0.15% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.15% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.15% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages