Peugeot 807 MOT Results

Registered in 2009

45.5% pass rate

from 220 tests in 2020

(53% worse than other 2009 cars)

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 807 is unusually good or bad.

24% fail on Suspension (87% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 11% fail on Suspension arms (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 10% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 11% fail on Anti-roll bars (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 4.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 4.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 2.7% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 0.45% fail on Linkage
  - 0.45% fail on Ball joint
- 5.0% fail on Springs
  - 5.0% fail on Coil springs
    - 5.0% fail on Coil spring
- 1.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (20 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.91% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.91% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.45% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.45% fail on Ball joint
23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (62% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 12% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Headlamps
  - 5.0% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.91% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (34 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Position lamps (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 5.0% fail on Position lamp (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.45% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.2% fail on Direction indicators
  - 3.2% fail on Flashing type
    - 2.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 0.91% fail on Side repeaters
    - 0.45% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.91% fail on Reversing lamps (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.91% fail on Reversing lamps (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
18% fail on Brakes (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 15% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 6.4% fail on Parking brake performance (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 6.4% fail on Rbt (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      - 5.9% fail on Parking brake performance (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      - 0.45% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
  - 5.5% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 5.5% fail on Rbt (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      - 4.1% fail on Service brake performance
      - 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.45% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.45% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.45% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 3.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 2.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 2.7% fail on Brake pads
  - 0.45% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
    - 0.45% fail on Lever
- 0.91% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.91% fail on Hand lever
  - 0.45% fail on Pedal
- 0.91% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 0.91% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.91% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.45% fail on Lever
- 0.45% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.45% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  - 0.45% fail on Electronic stability control
18% fail on Body, chassis, structure (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 12% fail on Transmission (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 12% fail on Drive shafts (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 12% fail on Joints (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.91% fail on Doors
  - 0.45% fail on Front passenger's door
    - 0.45% fail on Door condition
  - 0.45% fail on Other passenger's door
    - 0.45% fail on Door condition
- 0.45% fail on Bumpers
- 0.45% fail on Seats
  - 0.45% fail on Passenger's seat
12% fail on Tyres (86% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 7.7% fail on Tread depth (99% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Condition
5.5% fail on Steering (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Steering linkage components (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 4.1% fail on Track rod end (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Power steering (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Operation (39 times worse than other 2009 cars)
4.5% fail on Visibility
- 2.7% fail on Wipers
- 2.3% fail on Washers
4.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 3.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 3.2% fail on Compression ignition
    - 1.4% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    - 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.45% fail on Emissions not tested
  - 0.45% fail on Spark ignition
    - 0.45% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.45% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.45% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
0.91% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.45% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.45% fail on Condition
- 0.45% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
0.45% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.45% fail on Registration plates
0.45% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.45% fail on Attachment

Read the Honest John Review

Peugeot 807 (2003 - 2010)
Practical, versatile cabin packed with safety and comfort features. Most seat seven. Easy to drive. Five-star crash test rating.