Peugeot 807 MOT Results
Registered in 200947.6% pass rate
from 189 tests in 2021
(42% worse than other 2009 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 807 is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Brakes
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
18% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
17% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 17% fail on Rbt (sp) (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Parking brake performance
(6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Rbt
(6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Parking brake performance (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Rbt
(6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.53% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.53% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.53% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.53% fail on
Rbt
- 0.53% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.53% fail on
Rbt
-
17% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.6% fail on Brake pads
-
2.1% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 2.1% fail on Brake discs
-
2.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
2.1% fail on
Parking brake control
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Lever (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 2.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Pedal (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Hand lever
- 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 1.1% fail on Flexible brake hoses (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
18% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
23% fail on
Suspension
(55% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
8.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 7.4% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
7.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(100% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 2.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint
- 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.53% fail on Linkage
-
6.3% fail on
Springs
-
6.3% fail on
Coil springs
- 6.3% fail on Coil spring
-
6.3% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.53% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.53% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.53% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.53% fail on Ball joint
-
8.5% fail on
Suspension arms
-
20% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(55% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Headlamps
(110% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Headlamp
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (54 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
5.3% fail on
Direction indicators
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Flashing type
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Side repeaters
-
5.3% fail on
Flashing type
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
-
6.9% fail on
Headlamps
(110% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
15% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
8.5% fail on
Transmission
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
7.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 7.9% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.53% fail on Joints
-
7.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Doors
(11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Other passenger's door
(24 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Door condition (25 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.53% fail on Door condition
-
2.6% fail on
Other passenger's door
(24 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.53% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.53% fail on
Seats
- 0.53% fail on Passenger's seat
-
8.5% fail on
Transmission
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
12% fail on
Visibility
(97% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 7.4% fail on Washers (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Wipers
-
5.3% fail on
Tyres
- 3.7% fail on Tread depth
- 2.6% fail on Condition
-
4.8% fail on
Steering
-
4.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
(150% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Track rod end (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
(150% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.2% fail on
Compression ignition
- 2.1% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.53% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.53% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
3.2% fail on
Compression ignition
-
3.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.6% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.53% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.53% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.53% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.53% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Peugeot 807 (2003 - 2010)
Practical, versatile cabin packed with safety and comfort features. Most seat seven. Easy to drive. Five-star crash test rating.