Peugeot 807 MOT Results
Registered in 200939.8% pass rate
from 216 tests in 2017
(84% worse than other 2009 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 807 is unusually good or bad.
-
32% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(110% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 14% fail on Registration plate lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 13% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Position lamps
(160% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 8.8% fail on Front lamps (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Rear lamps
-
5.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.6% fail on Headlamp
-
0.46% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.46% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.3% fail on Individual lamps
-
2.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.93% fail on Electrical wiring (36 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.93% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.93% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.46% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
29% fail on
Suspension
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 11% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Linkage condition
-
9.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 9.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Front drive shafts
(5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 7.4% fail on Constant velocity joints (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Front drive shafts
(5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Coil springs
- 4.2% fail on Condition
- 4.2% fail on Front suspension joints (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.93% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.93% fail on Front
-
0.46% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.46% fail on Condition
-
11% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
(160% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Rear wheels (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 7.9% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.93% fail on Front wheels
- 0.46% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.8% fail on
Parking brake
(5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
1.4% fail on
Components
- 0.93% fail on Pipes
- 0.46% fail on Hoses
- 0.46% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Components
-
1.9% fail on
Hub components
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads
- 0.93% fail on Brake discs
-
0.93% fail on
Service brake control components
(8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.93% fail on
Pedal
(8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Anti-slip (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.93% fail on
Pedal
(8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.93% fail on
Mechanical components
(18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Lever
- 0.46% fail on Cable
- 0.46% fail on ABS
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
11% fail on
Tyres
- 6.0% fail on Condition
- 5.1% fail on Tread depth
- 0.46% fail on Valve stem
-
8.8% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.2% fail on Wipers
- 3.2% fail on Washers
- 1.4% fail on Windscreen
-
7.4% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Exhaust system (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.46% fail on System
-
4.6% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Doors
(17 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Passengers other (39 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Drivers
- 0.46% fail on Body condition
-
0.46% fail on
Seats
- 0.46% fail on Drivers
- 0.46% fail on Spare wheel
-
3.2% fail on
Doors
(17 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Steering
-
0.93% fail on
Steering system
- 0.46% fail on Ball joint
- 0.46% fail on Track rod end
-
0.93% fail on
Power steering
(9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Operation (28 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Electronic power steering
- 0.46% fail on Steering operation
-
0.93% fail on
Steering system
-
1.4% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Requirements
- 0.46% fail on Condition
- 0.46% fail on Attachment
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.46% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review
-
Peugeot 807 (2003 - 2010)
Practical, versatile cabin packed with safety and comfort features. Most seat seven. Easy to drive. Five-star crash test rating.