Peugeot 807 MOT Results

Registered in 2009
39.8% pass rate
from 216 tests in 2017
(84% worse than other 2009 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 807 is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 14% fail on Registration plate lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 13% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 9.7% fail on Position lamps (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.8% fail on Front lamps (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.46% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.46% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.3% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.93% fail on Electrical wiring (36 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.93% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.93% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.46% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 29% fail on Suspension (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 11% fail on Anti-roll bars (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 11% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Linkage condition
    • 9.3% fail on Suspension arms (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 9.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Drive shafts (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Front drive shafts (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 7.4% fail on Constant velocity joints (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Coil springs
      • 4.2% fail on Condition
    • 4.2% fail on Front suspension joints (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.93% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.93% fail on Front
    • 0.46% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.46% fail on Condition
  • 17% fail on Brakes (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.3% fail on Rear wheels (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.93% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.46% fail on Service brake performance
    • 2.8% fail on Parking brake (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.4% fail on Components
        • 0.93% fail on Pipes
        • 0.46% fail on Hoses
      • 0.46% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Hub components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.93% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.93% fail on Service brake control components (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Pedal (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.93% fail on Anti-slip (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.93% fail on Mechanical components (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Lever
      • 0.46% fail on Cable
    • 0.46% fail on ABS
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 6.0% fail on Condition
    • 5.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.46% fail on Valve stem
  • 8.8% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.2% fail on Wipers
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 1.4% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Exhaust system (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.46% fail on System
  • 4.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Doors (17 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Passengers other (39 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Drivers
    • 0.46% fail on Body condition
    • 0.46% fail on Seats
      • 0.46% fail on Drivers
    • 0.46% fail on Spare wheel
  • 1.9% fail on Steering
    • 0.93% fail on Steering system
      • 0.46% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.46% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.93% fail on Power steering (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Operation (28 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Electronic power steering
    • 0.46% fail on Steering operation
  • 1.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Requirements
      • 0.46% fail on Condition
      • 0.46% fail on Attachment
  • 0.46% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.46% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review

  • Peugeot 807 (2003 - 2010)
    Practical, versatile cabin packed with safety and comfort features. Most seat seven. Easy to drive. Five-star crash test rating.

    Search Good Garages