Peugeot 807 MOT Results

Registered in 2006
43.9% pass rate
from 767 tests in 2020
(30% worse than other 2006 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 807 is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (49% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 11% fail on Stop lamp (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Position lamps (82% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Position lamp (82% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.1% fail on Direction indicators (98% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Flashing type (98% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 4.2% fail on Individual direction indicators (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.52% fail on Side repeaters
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.78% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.52% fail on Switch (14 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (9 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (12 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.39% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.26% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.13% fail on Horn
    • 0.13% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.13% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.13% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 25% fail on Suspension (51% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 10% fail on Anti-roll bars (92% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Linkage ball joints (160% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (87% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage
    • 8.7% fail on Suspension arms (61% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes (90% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Springs (54% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Coil springs (52% worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 6.5% fail on Coil spring (52% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.13% fail on Spring saddle
    • 3.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.26% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.13% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.65% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.52% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.13% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 23% fail on Brakes (88% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 18% fail on Brake performance (190% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 15% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 15% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 7.2% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 6.6% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 0.52% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.13% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.91% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.13% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.78% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.52% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.26% fail on Cable
        • 0.26% fail on Lever
    • 2.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.78% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.65% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 1.0% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.65% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.52% fail on Pedal
    • 1.0% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.0% fail on Lever
    • 0.65% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.65% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (9 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Prescribed areas (35 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (210 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.13% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure (89% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Transmission
      • 4.3% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.3% fail on Joints
      • 0.26% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.26% fail on Joints
    • 4.4% fail on Doors (10 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Other passenger's door (16 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Door condition (16 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Driver's door (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Hinge (97 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.26% fail on Door condition
        • 0.13% fail on Hinge
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.52% fail on Pipe (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.13% fail on Hose
      • 0.13% fail on System
    • 0.78% fail on Seats (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Driver's seat (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.52% fail on Chassis
      • 0.52% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.13% fail on Towbar
      • 0.13% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.13% fail on Body
      • 0.13% fail on Body condition
  • 10% fail on Visibility (47% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Washers (75% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.52% fail on View to rear
      • 0.52% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.13% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.13% fail on Windscreen
  • 9.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (50% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (48% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 5.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.78% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (5 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (10 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Spark ignition (72% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.91% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (60% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.39% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.13% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.91% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.65% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Other leaks
  • 8.5% fail on Tyres
    • 4.6% fail on Condition
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
  • 7.0% fail on Steering (110% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Steering linkage components (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Track rod end (140% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.39% fail on Steering wheel (27 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.26% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.26% fail on Power steering
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
    • 0.13% fail on Steering play
      • 0.13% fail on Steering rack
  • 3.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.1% fail on Seat belts (110% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.91% fail on Condition
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 1.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.78% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.78% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

  • Peugeot 807 (2003 - 2010)
    Practical, versatile cabin packed with safety and comfort features. Most seat seven. Easy to drive. Five-star crash test rating.

    Search Good Garages