Peugeot 807 MOT Results

Registered in 2005

45.8% pass rate

from 251 tests in 2021

(24% worse than other 2005 cars)

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 807 is unusually good or bad.

23% fail on Suspension
- 10.0% fail on Suspension arms (69% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 4.4% fail on Ball joint
  - 3.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.40% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 9.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (80% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 4.4% fail on Linkage ball joints (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 4.0% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.80% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.80% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.40% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  - 0.40% fail on Linkage
- 6.8% fail on Springs
  - 6.8% fail on Coil springs
    - 6.8% fail on Coil spring
    - 0.40% fail on Mounting
- 3.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 0.80% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.80% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.40% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.40% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.40% fail on Ball joint
20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.80% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 4.8% fail on Headlamps
  - 4.8% fail on Headlamp
- 4.4% fail on Direction indicators
  - 4.4% fail on Flashing type
    - 4.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 1.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.40% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.40% fail on Position lamp
- 0.40% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.40% fail on Horn
17% fail on Brakes
- 13% fail on Brake performance (72% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 5.6% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 5.6% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      - 4.4% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      - 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (28 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      - 0.40% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
  - 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
    - 2.0% fail on Rbt
      - 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.40% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.40% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 0.80% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 4.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 1.6% fail on Parking brake control
  - 1.6% fail on Lever
- 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 1.2% fail on Brake pads
  - 0.40% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.40% fail on Brake discs
- 1.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  - 0.80% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.40% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.40% fail on Pedal
16% fail on Body, chassis, structure (89% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Doors (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 5.6% fail on Other passenger's door (21 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 5.6% fail on Door condition (22 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.8% fail on Transmission
  - 2.8% fail on Drive shafts
    - 2.8% fail on Joints
- 2.0% fail on Seats (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.2% fail on Passenger's seat (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.80% fail on Driver's seat (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.80% fail on Spare wheel (36 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.40% fail on Spare wheel condition
  - 0.40% fail on Carrier
- 0.40% fail on Chassis
  - 0.40% fail on Chassis condition
13% fail on Visibility (70% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 9.6% fail on Washers (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Wipers
7.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 7.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 5.2% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 3.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.40% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.40% fail on Other emission control equipment
    - 0.40% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    - 0.40% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
  - 2.0% fail on Spark ignition
    - 0.80% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.80% fail on Emissions not tested
    - 0.40% fail on Catalyst emissions
6.0% fail on Tyres
- 3.6% fail on Condition
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth
4.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 2.4% fail on Seat belts
  - 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 1.2% fail on Condition
- 2.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
4.0% fail on Steering
- 3.2% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 2.8% fail on Track rod end
  - 0.40% fail on Ball joint
- 0.40% fail on Power steering
  - 0.40% fail on Other components
- 0.40% fail on Steering column
0.40% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.40% fail on Registration plates
0.40% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.40% fail on Attachment

Read the Honest John Review

Peugeot 807 (2003 - 2010)
Practical, versatile cabin packed with safety and comfort features. Most seat seven. Easy to drive. Five-star crash test rating.