Peugeot 807 MOT Results

Registered in 2005
45.8% pass rate
from 463 tests in 2020
(19% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 807 is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.6% fail on Position lamps (75% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Position lamp (79% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.22% fail on Matched pair
    • 5.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (87% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.65% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.43% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.65% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.65% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.65% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.43% fail on Rear reflectors (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.43% fail on Horn
  • 22% fail on Suspension (27% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (67% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage
    • 8.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.5% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.43% fail on Suspension arm
    • 5.6% fail on Springs
      • 5.6% fail on Coil springs
        • 5.6% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.65% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.43% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (31 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.43% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.22% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.22% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 22% fail on Brakes (59% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (sp) (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 6.5% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 5.2% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.43% fail on Plate brake tester (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.86% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.65% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 6.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (83% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Brake linings and pads (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 5.2% fail on Brake pads (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.65% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.43% fail on Cable
        • 0.22% fail on Lever
    • 2.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.3% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.7% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.43% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.43% fail on Lever
    • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.22% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.22% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 14% fail on Visibility (89% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.3% fail on Washers (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.22% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.22% fail on View to rear
      • 0.22% fail on Mirrors
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure (55% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.5% fail on Transmission
      • 3.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.2% fail on Joints
      • 0.22% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.22% fail on Joints
    • 3.5% fail on Doors (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Other passenger's door (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Door condition (12 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.43% fail on Hinge (101 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Seats (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Driver's seat (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.22% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.22% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.22% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.22% fail on Pipe
    • 0.22% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.22% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.22% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 5.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 5.4% fail on Condition (73% worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 8.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 6.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.8% fail on Compression ignition (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.65% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.22% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 1.9% fail on Spark ignition (61% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Fluid leaks (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.22% fail on Other leaks
  • 6.0% fail on Steering
    • 5.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 5.0% fail on Track rod end (75% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Power steering
      • 0.43% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.43% fail on Other components
    • 0.22% fail on Steering play
      • 0.22% fail on Steering rack
  • 4.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.65% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.65% fail on Airbags (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Drivers airbag (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.22% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.22% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.22% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.22% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Peugeot 807 (2003 - 2010)
    Practical, versatile cabin packed with safety and comfort features. Most seat seven. Easy to drive. Five-star crash test rating.

    Search Good Garages