Peugeot 807 MOT Results

Registered in 2004
45.7% pass rate
from 895 tests in 2017
(15% worse than other 2004 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 807 is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (34% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 14% fail on Registration plate lamp (110% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 10% fail on Position lamps (50% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 9.3% fail on Front lamps (73% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear lamps
    • 8.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.5% fail on Headlamp (41% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.11% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 6.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.5% fail on Direction indicators (75% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Flashing type (75% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 4.9% fail on Individual lamps (160% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.22% fail on Side repeaters (78% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Horn (170% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.89% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.11% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.11% fail on Switch
    • 0.45% fail on Electrical wiring (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.22% fail on Trailer electrical socket (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Battery
  • 29% fail on Suspension (44% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 13% fail on Anti-roll bars (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 11% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.34% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 7.7% fail on Suspension arms (74% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (82% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment
    • 6.7% fail on Coil springs
      • 6.7% fail on Condition (41% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Drive shafts (74% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Front drive shafts (77% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 6.5% fail on Constant velocity joints (75% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Couplings
    • 3.1% fail on Front suspension joints (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.89% fail on Front
    • 0.89% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.67% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.11% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.11% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 0.78% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.78% fail on Condition
    • 0.67% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.45% fail on Condition
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.56% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.22% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.11% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 23% fail on Brakes (55% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 13% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 8.4% fail on Rear wheels (130% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.67% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.34% fail on Service brake performance
    • 5.3% fail on Hub components (53% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.1% fail on Brake calipers (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.6% fail on Parking brake (160% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Hydraulic systems (63% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Components (63% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Pipes (58% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Hoses (79% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
    • 1.0% fail on Restricted movement (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on ABS
    • 0.45% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.45% fail on Pedal
        • 0.45% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.45% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.34% fail on Cable
      • 0.11% fail on Lever
    • 0.22% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 14% fail on Driver's view of the road (66% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Washers (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.67% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.45% fail on Mirrors
  • 9.9% fail on Tyres
    • 6.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.34% fail on Size/type
  • 6.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.8% fail on Emissions
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on System (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
      • 0.11% fail on Cap
    • 0.34% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 5.0% fail on Steering
    • 4.0% fail on Steering system
      • 3.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.22% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.11% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.56% fail on Power steering
      • 0.45% fail on Pipes and hoses (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
    • 0.22% fail on Steering control
      • 0.11% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.11% fail on Steering column
    • 0.22% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.11% fail on Locking devices
  • 4.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.8% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (75% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (89% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
      • 0.45% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.34% fail on Attachment (9 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Requirements
  • 3.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Doors (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Passengers other (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Drivers
    • 1.0% fail on Seats (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Drivers (5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Passengers
    • 0.45% fail on Body condition
    • 0.11% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.11% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.11% fail on Chassis
    • 0.11% fail on Load security
      • 0.11% fail on Tailgate
    • 0.11% fail on Spare wheel
  • 1.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.34% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.22% fail on Attachment
    • 0.11% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Peugeot 807 (2003 - 2010)
    Practical, versatile cabin packed with safety and comfort features. Most seat seven. Easy to drive. Five-star crash test rating.

    Search Good Garages