Peugeot 807 MOT Results
Registered in 200340.5% pass rate
from 808 tests in 2017
(23% worse than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 807 is unusually good or bad.
-
36% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(35% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
13% fail on
Position lamps
(87% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 12% fail on Front lamps (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.25% fail on All position lamps
- 12% fail on Registration plate lamp (65% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Headlamps
(61% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Headlamp (48% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.50% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
(4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 7.7% fail on Headlamp aim
-
7.1% fail on
Direction indicators
(150% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Flashing type
(150% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Individual lamps (200% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.5% fail on All direction indicators (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Side repeaters
-
7.1% fail on
Flashing type
(150% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.9% fail on Horn (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.99% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.25% fail on Switch (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.12% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.12% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.12% fail on Lamp
-
13% fail on
Position lamps
(87% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
31% fail on
Suspension
(51% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(74% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 8.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.25% fail on Linkage condition
-
9.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(140% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
9.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
(140% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 9.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.25% fail on Drive shafts
-
9.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
(140% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(50% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (54% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Attachment
-
6.8% fail on
Coil springs
(55% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Condition (58% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Front suspension joints (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.9% fail on Condition
-
1.5% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 1.4% fail on Component mounting
- 0.12% fail on Subframe mounting
-
0.62% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.25% fail on Condition
- 0.25% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.62% fail on
Wheel bearings
(65% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Front
- 0.12% fail on Rear
-
0.37% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.25% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.12% fail on Attachment
-
0.37% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.37% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.25% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.25% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
9.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(74% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
23% fail on
Brakes
(41% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
(98% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 13% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 9.2% fail on Rear wheels (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Front wheels
- 0.74% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.74% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.1% fail on
Hub components
- 2.6% fail on Brake pads
- 0.74% fail on Brake discs
- 0.74% fail on Brake calipers (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(56% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Components
(68% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Pipes (66% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Hoses (81% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Pump
- 0.62% fail on Leaks
- 0.25% fail on Operation
- 0.12% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
1.9% fail on
Components
(68% better than other 2003 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Parking brake
(130% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.99% fail on ABS
-
0.87% fail on
Service brake control components
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.87% fail on
Pedal
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Anti-slip (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Condition
-
0.87% fail on
Pedal
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.50% fail on Cable
- 0.12% fail on Lever
- 0.50% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.37% fail on Electronic stability system
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
(98% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
16% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(76% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 8.4% fail on Wipers (64% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Washers (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Mirrors
- 0.12% fail on Windscreen
-
10% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(36% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 7.1% fail on Exhaust system (62% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Emissions
- 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.74% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.50% fail on System
- 0.25% fail on Pipe
-
9.3% fail on
Tyres
- 6.2% fail on Tread depth
- 3.6% fail on Condition
- 0.37% fail on Size/type
-
8.0% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(140% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Drivers airbag
-
2.7% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.2% fail on Condition
- 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.25% fail on Requirements
- 0.25% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Doors
(9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Passengers other (15 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Drivers
- 0.12% fail on Passengers front
- 1.1% fail on Body condition
-
1.1% fail on
Seats
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Passengers (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Drivers
-
0.50% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.50% fail on Chassis
-
5.9% fail on
Doors
(9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Steering
-
2.6% fail on
Steering system
(43% better than other 2003 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Track rod end
-
0.25% fail on
Free play
- 0.25% fail on Steering rack
- 0.25% fail on Steering rack
- 0.12% fail on Ball joint
-
0.87% fail on
Power steering
- 0.50% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.25% fail on Operation
- 0.12% fail on Other components
-
0.12% fail on
Steering control
- 0.12% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas
-
2.6% fail on
Steering system
(43% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.1% fail on Registration plate
-
0.37% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.37% fail on Attachment
-
0.12% fail on
Towbars
- 0.12% fail on Towbar
Read the Honest John Review
-
Peugeot 807 (2003 - 2010)
Practical, versatile cabin packed with safety and comfort features. Most seat seven. Easy to drive. Five-star crash test rating.