MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 807 » 2003

Peugeot 807 MOT Results

Registered in 2003
40.5% pass rate
from 808 tests in 2017
(23% worse than other 2003 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 807 is unusually good or bad.

  • 36% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (35% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 13% fail on Position lamps (87% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 12% fail on Front lamps (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.25% fail on All position lamps
    • 12% fail on Registration plate lamp (65% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Headlamps (61% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Headlamp (48% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 7.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 7.1% fail on Direction indicators (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Flashing type (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 5.2% fail on Individual lamps (200% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on All direction indicators (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.74% fail on Side repeaters
    • 5.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Horn (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.99% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.25% fail on Switch (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.12% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.12% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.12% fail on Lamp
  • 31% fail on Suspension (51% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (74% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 8.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage condition
    • 9.5% fail on Drive shafts (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 9.3% fail on Front drive shafts (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 9.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.25% fail on Drive shafts
    • 6.9% fail on Suspension arms (50% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (54% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment
    • 6.8% fail on Coil springs (55% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Condition (58% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Front suspension joints (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.4% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 0.62% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.25% fail on Condition
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.62% fail on Wheel bearings (65% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Front
      • 0.12% fail on Rear
    • 0.37% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.25% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment
    • 0.37% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.37% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.25% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.25% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 23% fail on Brakes (41% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (98% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 13% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Rear wheels (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.74% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.74% fail on Service brake performance
    • 4.1% fail on Hub components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.74% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.74% fail on Brake calipers (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (56% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Components (68% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Pipes (66% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Hoses (81% better than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Pump
      • 0.62% fail on Leaks
      • 0.25% fail on Operation
      • 0.12% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Parking brake (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on ABS
    • 0.87% fail on Service brake control components (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.74% fail on Anti-slip (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Condition
    • 0.62% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.50% fail on Cable
      • 0.12% fail on Lever
    • 0.50% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.37% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 16% fail on Driver's view of the road (76% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 8.4% fail on Wipers (64% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Washers (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.12% fail on Windscreen
  • 10% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (36% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Exhaust system (62% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Emissions
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.74% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.50% fail on System
      • 0.25% fail on Pipe
  • 9.3% fail on Tyres
    • 6.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.37% fail on Size/type
  • 8.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.25% fail on Requirements
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 7.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Doors (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Passengers other (15 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Drivers
      • 0.12% fail on Passengers front
    • 1.1% fail on Body condition
    • 1.1% fail on Seats (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Passengers (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Drivers
    • 0.50% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.50% fail on Chassis
  • 3.7% fail on Steering
    • 2.6% fail on Steering system (43% better than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.25% fail on Free play
        • 0.25% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.25% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.87% fail on Power steering
      • 0.50% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.25% fail on Operation
      • 0.12% fail on Other components
    • 0.12% fail on Steering control
      • 0.12% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.37% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.37% fail on Attachment
  • 0.12% fail on Towbars
    • 0.12% fail on Towbar
Read the Honest John Review

  • Peugeot 807 (2003 - 2010)
    Practical, versatile cabin packed with safety and comfort features. Most seat seven. Easy to drive. Five-star crash test rating.

    Search Good Garages