Peugeot 806 MOT Results

Registered in 1999
50.8% pass rate
from 63 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 806 is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 7.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 6.3% fail on Side repeaters (7 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on All direction indicators
        • 1.6% fail on Individual lamps
    • 6.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.6% fail on Battery
  • 22% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 13% fail on Components
        • 4.8% fail on Hoses
        • 3.2% fail on Pipes
        • 3.2% fail on Reservoirs (25 times worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Cylinders
        • 1.6% fail on Valves
      • 3.2% fail on Leaks (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 1.6% fail on Operation
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 11% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 4.8% fail on Service brake performance
    • 3.2% fail on Hub components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.6% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.6% fail on Pedal
        • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on ABS
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Drive shafts (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 11% fail on Front drive shafts (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
        • 11% fail on Constant velocity joints (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Front suspension joints (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 4.8% fail on Component mounting
    • 3.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.6% fail on Coil springs
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Trailing arms
      • 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.6% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
  • 14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.2% fail on Emissions
    • 1.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.6% fail on Cap
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 13% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (200% worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Doors (10 times worse than other 1999 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Passengers other (20 times worse than other 1999 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Body condition
    • 1.6% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.6% fail on Chassis
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Windscreen
    • 1.6% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.9% fail on Steering
    • 7.9% fail on Steering system
      • 4.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 3.2% fail on Steering rack
      • 1.6% fail on Free play
        • 1.6% fail on Steering rack
  • 4.8% fail on Tyres
    • 4.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.6% fail on Condition
  • 4.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 1.6% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.6% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 1.6% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages