Peugeot 607 MOT Results
Registered in 200357.3% pass rate
from 96 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 607 is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
6.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
6.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 5.2% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Side repeaters
-
6.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
4.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.2% fail on Headlamp
-
4.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 1.0% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.0% fail on Rear reflectors
-
6.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
14% fail on
Suspension
-
8.3% fail on
Sub-frames
(13 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Sub-frame (27 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.2% fail on Ball joint
-
3.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.0% fail on Ball joint
- 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.0% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
8.3% fail on
Sub-frames
(13 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
11% fail on
Brakes
-
7.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 5.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
3.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
2.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt
- 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.0% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt
-
5.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
4.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
4.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.0% fail on Brake pads
-
1.0% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 1.0% fail on Cable
-
4.2% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 1.0% fail on Pedal
-
1.0% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 1.0% fail on Electronic stability control
-
7.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
10% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
3.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 3.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.0% fail on
Sub-frame
- 1.0% fail on Sub-frame condition
- 3.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.1% fail on
Seats
(7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Driver's seat (14 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Chassis
- 1.0% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.0% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.0% fail on Tank
-
1.0% fail on
Transmission
-
1.0% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.0% fail on Joints
-
1.0% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.1% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
9.4% fail on
Visibility
- 5.2% fail on Wipers
- 5.2% fail on Washers
-
7.3% fail on
Steering
-
4.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 4.2% fail on Track rod end
-
3.1% fail on
Steering gear
- 3.1% fail on Steering rack
-
4.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
4.2% fail on
Tyres
- 3.1% fail on Condition
- 1.0% fail on Tread depth
-
3.1% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
2.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.0% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.0% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.0% fail on
Spark ignition
-
1.0% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.0% fail on Other leaks
-
2.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.0% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.0% fail on Registration plates
-
1.0% fail on
Road Wheels
- 1.0% fail on Attachment