Peugeot 607 MOT Results

Registered in 2002
58.9% pass rate
from 224 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 607 is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.8% fail on Direction indicators (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Flashing type (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Individual lamps
        • 2.7% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.45% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.45% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 3.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.45% fail on Rear lamps
    • 1.8% fail on Battery
    • 1.3% fail on Stop lamp (79% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.45% fail on Fog lamp
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 8.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.5% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.8% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.45% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 4.0% fail on Hub components
      • 3.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.89% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.6% fail on ABS (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Electronic stability system (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.7% fail on Components
        • 2.7% fail on Pipes
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
      • 0.45% fail on Fitment
    • 0.45% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.45% fail on Cable
    • 0.45% fail on Restricted movement
  • 13% fail on Suspension (38% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.89% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.89% fail on Linkage condition
    • 3.6% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.6% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.6% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.89% fail on Front
      • 0.89% fail on Rear
    • 0.89% fail on Suspension arms (81% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Condition
      • 0.45% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.89% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.89% fail on Condition
    • 0.45% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.45% fail on Condition
    • 0.45% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.45% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.45% fail on Condition
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 4.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.45% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.9% fail on Tyres
    • 8.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.3% fail on Condition
  • 6.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.45% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.45% fail on System
  • 5.8% fail on Steering
    • 5.8% fail on Steering system
      • 4.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.3% fail on Steering rack
  • 4.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.6% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 3.6% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.45% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.45% fail on Condition
  • 3.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.3% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis
    • 1.3% fail on Seats (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Drivers (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Body condition

Search Good Garages