Peugeot 5008 MOT Results

Registered in 2016
71.2% pass rate
from 2,006 tests in 2020
(130% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 5008 is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 13% fail on Stop lamp (31 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamps (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim (75% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (51% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (18 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.25% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.050% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.30% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.30% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.30% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.15% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.15% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.100% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.050% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.100% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.100% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.100% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.050% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.050% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 7.6% fail on Tyres (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
    • 0.15% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 2.9% fail on Brakes (46% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.100% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.100% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.40% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Pedal (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.20% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.20% fail on Rbt
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.050% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.050% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.050% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.050% fail on Rbt
          • 0.050% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.050% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.050% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 0.30% fail on Flexible brake hoses (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.100% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.050% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.050% fail on Brake fluid
  • 2.1% fail on Visibility
    • 1.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.75% fail on Wipers (60% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on View to rear
      • 0.15% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.050% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.050% fail on Windscreen
  • 0.80% fail on Body, chassis, structure (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Seats (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Passenger's seat (14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.100% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.100% fail on Doors
      • 0.050% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.050% fail on Hinge
      • 0.050% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.050% fail on Door condition
    • 0.050% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.050% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.050% fail on Body
      • 0.050% fail on Panel
    • 0.050% fail on Undertray
  • 0.80% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.60% fail on Suspension
    • 0.20% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.100% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.100% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Other suspension component (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.100% fail on Ball joint (21 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.050% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.100% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.050% fail on Springs
      • 0.050% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.050% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.050% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.050% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.050% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.050% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.55% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.35% fail on Fluid leaks (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Engine oil leaks (20 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.15% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.100% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.100% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.050% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.050% fail on Undertray
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.25% fail on Attachment
  • 0.100% fail on Steering
    • 0.050% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.050% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.050% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.050% fail on Track rod end
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages