Peugeot 5008 MOT Results
Registered in 201668.9% pass rate
from 1,814 tests in 2021
(95% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 5008 is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 9.3% fail on Stop lamp (13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Headlamps
(4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Headlamp (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
(83% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (62% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.44% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.44% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.44% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.28% fail on
Reversing lamps
(5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Reversing lamps (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Reversing lamp switch
- 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.055% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.055% fail on Position lamp
-
0.055% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.055% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.055% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.055% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.055% fail on
Flashing type
-
8.8% fail on
Tyres
(130% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Tread depth (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Size/type
-
5.9% fail on
Brakes
(110% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(120% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(110% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Brake pads (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(190% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Brake discs (190% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(110% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Brake performance
(130% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.94% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.94% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.66% fail on
Rbt
- 0.55% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.66% fail on
Rbt
-
0.11% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.11% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.11% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.11% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.11% fail on
Rbt
- 0.055% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.055% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.11% fail on
Rbt
- 0.055% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.94% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.28% fail on Electronic parking brake (14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.22% fail on Pedal (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
4.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(120% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Visibility
- 1.9% fail on Washers (73% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Wipers (61% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.055% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.055% fail on Windscreen
-
2.1% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Transmission
(5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Joints (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Seats
(8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Passenger's seat (16 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.055% fail on
Body
- 0.055% fail on Other body component
- 0.055% fail on Undertray
-
1.4% fail on
Transmission
(5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(140% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(110% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.17% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.055% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.44% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.44% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Fluid leaks
(8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Engine oil leaks (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Other leaks
-
1.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(110% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Suspension
-
0.77% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.28% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint
- 0.055% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.17% fail on
Springs
(86% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Coil springs
(86% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Coil spring (85% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Coil springs
(86% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Macpherson strut
(7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes (17 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.055% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.055% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.77% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.33% fail on Attachment
- 0.11% fail on Condition
-
0.39% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.28% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.28% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.28% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.33% fail on
Steering
-
0.22% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.22% fail on Track rod end
- 0.055% fail on Steering arm
-
0.055% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.055% fail on Steering rack
-
0.055% fail on
Power steering
- 0.055% fail on Other components
-
0.22% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.17% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.17% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Peugeot 5008 (2010 - 2017)
Practical and versatile seating layout, good range of engines, comfortable to drive, good value as a used buy.