Peugeot 5008 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
49.2% pass rate
from 3,168 tests in 2020
(49% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 5008 is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (92% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 11% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Headlamps (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.032% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.032% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 5.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Position lamps (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Position lamp (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.76% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.73% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.73% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.032% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.032% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 0.44% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.44% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.41% fail on Direction indicators (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Flashing type (78% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.095% fail on Individual direction indicators (92% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.13% fail on Horn
      • 0.032% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.032% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.032% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.13% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.095% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.095% fail on Switch
  • 13% fail on Brakes (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.4% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.032% fail on Brake linings
      • 2.1% fail on Brake discs and drums (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Brake discs (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.16% fail on Cable
        • 0.032% fail on Linkage
    • 5.3% fail on Brake performance (67% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.032% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.35% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.47% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.44% fail on Rbt
          • 0.28% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.16% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.032% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.032% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.28% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.28% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.73% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.51% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.66% fail on Parking brake control (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Electronic parking brake (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Flexible brake hoses (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.28% fail on Pedal
    • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.16% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.063% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.16% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.032% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.032% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.032% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.032% fail on Other braking system component
  • 13% fail on Suspension (16% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Springs (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Coil springs (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 7.1% fail on Coil spring (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.38% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.032% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (36% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.47% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.095% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.063% fail on Linkage
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint dust cover (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Shock absorbers (43% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Other suspension component (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.13% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.095% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.032% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.063% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.032% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.032% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.063% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.063% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.032% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.032% fail on Axles
      • 0.032% fail on Axle
  • 9.8% fail on Tyres (53% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Tread depth (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Condition (34% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Size/type
  • 8.2% fail on Visibility (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Washers (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.35% fail on View to rear (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Mirrors (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.16% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.16% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Compression ignition (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.92% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 2.2% fail on Spark ignition (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.60% fail on Fluid leaks (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.13% fail on Noise suppression (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Sound deadening material (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Undertray
  • 4.6% fail on Steering (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Steering linkage components (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.095% fail on Power steering
      • 0.063% fail on Other components
      • 0.032% fail on Operation
    • 0.032% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.032% fail on Steering box
    • 0.032% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.032% fail on Steering column
  • 4.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Transmission (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Joints (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.063% fail on Joints
    • 0.82% fail on Exhaust system (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Undertray (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Body (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Other body component
      • 0.063% fail on Panel
    • 0.19% fail on Seats
      • 0.19% fail on Passenger's seat (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.16% fail on Spare wheel (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Spare wheel condition (19 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Carrier
    • 0.13% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.063% fail on System
      • 0.032% fail on Tank
      • 0.032% fail on Pipe
    • 0.095% fail on Doors
      • 0.063% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.063% fail on Catch (32 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.032% fail on Catch
    • 0.032% fail on Passenger compartment
  • 3.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.032% fail on Requirements
    • 0.16% fail on Airbags (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.095% fail on Drivers airbag (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Passengers airbag (29 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.60% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.60% fail on Attachment (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.57% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.57% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.032% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.032% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages