Peugeot 5008 MOT Results
Registered in 201057.2% pass rate
from 2,899 tests in 2017
(47% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 5008 is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(100% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 11% fail on Registration plate lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 9.7% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Position lamps
(110% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Front lamps (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.069% fail on All position lamps
- 5.9% fail on Headlamp aim (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Headlamps
(96% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Headlamp (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.034% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.034% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.034% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.034% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.52% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.52% fail on Fog lamp
-
0.31% fail on
Direction indicators
(80% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Flashing type
(80% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Side repeaters (68% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Individual lamps (88% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.034% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.31% fail on
Flashing type
(80% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.10% fail on Electrical wiring (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Horn
- 0.034% fail on Battery
- 0.034% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
10% fail on
Brakes
(79% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Hub components
(88% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Brake pads (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Brake discs (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Brake calipers
-
4.3% fail on
Brake performance
(97% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.41% fail on Front wheels
- 0.24% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.069% fail on Brake operation
- 0.034% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.45% fail on ABS (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.41% fail on Electronic parking brake (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Service brake control components
(190% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Pedal
(190% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Anti-slip (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Pedal
(190% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.24% fail on
Components
- 0.17% fail on Hoses
- 0.069% fail on Pipes
- 0.069% fail on Leaks
-
0.24% fail on
Components
- 0.21% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.14% fail on
Mechanical components
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Cable (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.034% fail on Additional braking devices
- 0.034% fail on Restricted movement
-
5.2% fail on
Hub components
(88% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
9.6% fail on
Suspension
(18% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Coil springs
(61% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Condition (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Location
-
1.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(79% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
(82% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (83% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
(82% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.069% fail on Attachment
-
1.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.79% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.034% fail on Condition
- 0.034% fail on Linkage condition
-
0.69% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.69% fail on Condition
- 0.41% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.38% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.28% fail on Front
- 0.10% fail on Rear
-
0.34% fail on
Macpherson strut
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.069% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.069% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.034% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.034% fail on Suspension unit
-
0.034% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.034% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
5.3% fail on
Coil springs
(61% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
8.4% fail on
Tyres
(24% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Tread depth (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Condition
- 0.21% fail on Size/type
- 0.14% fail on Valve stem
- 0.034% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
-
6.3% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(33% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Washers (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Wipers
- 0.38% fail on Windscreen
- 0.069% fail on Mirrors
-
2.3% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.3% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.034% fail on Drivers airbag
-
1.0% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.034% fail on Requirements
- 0.034% fail on Attachment
-
1.4% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Steering
(52% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Steering system
- 1.2% fail on Track rod end (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Steering rack
- 0.069% fail on Ball joint
-
0.034% fail on
Free play
- 0.034% fail on Steering rack
- 0.034% fail on Drag link end
- 0.10% fail on Steering operation
-
0.069% fail on
Power steering
- 0.069% fail on Operation
- 0.034% fail on Other components
-
0.034% fail on
Steering control
- 0.034% fail on Steering wheel
-
1.3% fail on
Steering system
-
1.1% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 0.38% fail on Emissions
-
0.31% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.14% fail on Tank (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.14% fail on System
- 0.034% fail on Cap
- 0.21% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.17% fail on Exhaust system (82% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.38% fail on Attachment
- 0.14% fail on Condition
-
0.38% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.31% fail on
Seats
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Passengers (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Drivers
- 0.069% fail on Body condition
-
0.31% fail on
Seats
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.28% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review
-
Peugeot 5008 (2010 - 2017)
Practical and versatile seating layout, good range of engines, comfortable to drive, good value as a used buy.