MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 406 » 2002

Peugeot 406 MOT Results

Registered in 2002
50.1% pass rate
from 3,759 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 406 is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.4% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.1% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.053% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.3% fail on Direction indicators (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Flashing type (130% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Individual lamps (86% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Side repeaters (200% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Switch (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.72% fail on All direction indicators (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.027% fail on Switch
    • 5.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.6% fail on Headlamp (21% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Switch
      • 0.027% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.027% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.027% fail on Matched pair
    • 5.0% fail on Stop lamp (21% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Battery
    • 0.67% fail on Rear fog lamp (56% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Fog lamp (57% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.027% fail on Switch
    • 0.27% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.080% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.080% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.053% fail on Lamp
      • 0.027% fail on Switch
    • 0.053% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 21% fail on Brakes (23% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (70% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.7% fail on Parking brake performance (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Rear wheels (65% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Front wheels (52% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.080% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.027% fail on Brake operation
    • 3.9% fail on Hub components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs (92% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.027% fail on Brake linings
    • 3.4% fail on Hydraulic systems (47% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Components (47% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Pipes (44% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.69% fail on Hoses (51% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.053% fail on Servos
        • 0.027% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.16% fail on Operation
      • 0.11% fail on Leaks (70% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 1.9% fail on ABS (73% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.98% fail on Condition
    • 0.40% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.37% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.35% fail on Cable
      • 0.027% fail on Stationary pin
    • 0.32% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.32% fail on Pedal
        • 0.29% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.027% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.29% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.080% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.053% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 0.027% fail on Operation
    • 0.027% fail on Additional braking devices
  • 20% fail on Suspension (8.1% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (47% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (61% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.053% fail on Attachment
      • 0.027% fail on Condition
    • 4.4% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.4% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.3% fail on Constant velocity joints
        • 0.027% fail on Couplings
      • 0.027% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.027% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.9% fail on Suspension arms (40% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (37% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Attachment
    • 2.5% fail on Tie bars/rods (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (10 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Condition
      • 0.027% fail on Attachment
    • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas (40% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Component mounting (31% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Subframe mounting (79% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Spring mounting
    • 1.4% fail on Coil springs (67% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition (68% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Location
    • 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.82% fail on Front
      • 0.45% fail on Rear (57% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.51% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.51% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.19% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.13% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.11% fail on Torque/reaction arms (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.053% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.053% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.027% fail on General condition
    • 0.027% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.027% fail on Condition
    • 0.027% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.027% fail on Condition
    • 0.027% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 9.5% fail on Tyres
    • 6.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.37% fail on Size/type
    • 0.11% fail on Valve stem
  • 9.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (19% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Exhaust system (54% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Emissions (43% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested (50% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.35% fail on System
      • 0.19% fail on Cap
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
      • 0.053% fail on Pipe
  • 8.9% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers
    • 3.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.53% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.21% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.053% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (45% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Seat belts (39% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Prescribed areas (53% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Requirements
    • 2.8% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (62% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (52% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Drivers airbag (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 4.0% fail on Steering (19% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Steering system (42% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Track rod end (41% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Steering rack (52% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.053% fail on Free play
        • 0.053% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.027% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.027% fail on Steering arm
    • 1.0% fail on Power steering (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Other components (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.27% fail on Operation
      • 0.053% fail on Rams
      • 0.027% fail on Pump
    • 0.59% fail on Steering operation (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.053% fail on Steering control
      • 0.027% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.027% fail on Steering column
  • 2.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.93% fail on Body condition
    • 0.72% fail on Seats (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Drivers (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Passengers
    • 0.45% fail on Doors
      • 0.40% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.053% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.13% fail on Vehicle structure (76% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Chassis (76% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.080% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.053% fail on Body security
    • 0.053% fail on Load security
      • 0.053% fail on Tailgate
    • 0.027% fail on Speedometer
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate
    • 0.027% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels (65% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 0.027% fail on Condition
  • 0.027% fail on Towbars
    • 0.027% fail on Towbar

Search Good Garages