Peugeot 406 MOT Results

Registered in 2000

53.8% pass rate

from 888 tests in 2021

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 406 is unusually good or bad.

17% fail on Suspension
- 6.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (69% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 3.2% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 0.90% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.90% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bar
  - 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 5.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 4.8% fail on Suspension arms
  - 3.4% fail on Ball joint (71% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.45% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.23% fail on Suspension arm
- 2.1% fail on Springs
  - 2.1% fail on Coil springs
    - 2.0% fail on Coil spring
    - 0.11% fail on Mounting
- 0.90% fail on Suspension rods (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.45% fail on Ball joint (25 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.68% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.68% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.56% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.23% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.11% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.11% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.11% fail on Sub-frame
17% fail on Brakes (26% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 12% fail on Brake performance (58% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 6.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (95% worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 6.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.11% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
  - 5.2% fail on Service brake performance (72% worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 5.1% fail on Rbt (74% worse than other 2000 cars)
      - 3.9% fail on Service brake performance (61% worse than other 2000 cars)
      - 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester
      - 0.11% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 3.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 3.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 2.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (74% worse than other 2000 cars)
      - 0.56% fail on Service brake performance
    - 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      - 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 1.5% fail on Rbt
      - 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      - 0.45% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester
      - 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
  - 0.45% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 3.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 1.8% fail on Brake pads
  - 0.90% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.90% fail on Brake discs
  - 0.23% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
    - 0.23% fail on Cable
- 1.7% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  - 0.23% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.45% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.34% fail on Pedal
  - 0.11% fail on Hand lever
- 0.45% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.34% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.23% fail on Master cylinder (14 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.11% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.23% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  - 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.11% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.11% fail on Lever
- 0.11% fail on Load sensing valves
14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.0% fail on Headlamps
  - 4.8% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.11% fail on Dipswitch
- 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.5% fail on Direction indicators
  - 3.5% fail on Flashing type
    - 2.3% fail on Side repeaters (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.56% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.90% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.45% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.45% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.45% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.11% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.11% fail on Position lamp
13% fail on Body, chassis, structure (29% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Exhaust system (74% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Transmission
  - 3.4% fail on Drive shafts
    - 3.3% fail on Joints
    - 0.11% fail on Drive shaft
- 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
  - 0.11% fail on Sub-frame
    - 0.11% fail on Sub-frame condition
- 0.90% fail on Chassis
  - 0.90% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.79% fail on Seats
  - 0.45% fail on Driver's seat
  - 0.34% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.68% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.34% fail on Pipe
  - 0.23% fail on Tank
  - 0.11% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.45% fail on Doors
  - 0.45% fail on Other passenger's door
    - 0.45% fail on Door condition
- 0.34% fail on Engine mounting (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 0.34% fail on Engine mounting condition (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Bumpers
- 0.11% fail on Load security
  - 0.11% fail on Tailgate
    - 0.11% fail on Tailgate condition
8.2% fail on Tyres (72% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Tread depth (80% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Condition (84% worse than other 2000 cars)
7.4% fail on Visibility
- 4.8% fail on Wipers
- 3.0% fail on Washers
- 0.34% fail on View to rear
  - 0.34% fail on Mirrors
6.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 6.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 4.6% fail on Spark ignition (40% better than other 2000 cars)
    - 2.6% fail on Catalyst emissions (52% better than other 2000 cars)
    - 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
    - 0.90% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.11% fail on Non catalyst emissions
  - 2.0% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 1.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.68% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (9 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.45% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    - 0.11% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.11% fail on Oxygen sensor
    - 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.11% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.11% fail on Engine oil leaks
5.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 4.2% fail on Seat belts (66% worse than other 2000 cars)
  - 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas
  - 1.2% fail on Condition
  - 0.11% fail on Requirements
- 1.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
3.5% fail on Steering
- 2.4% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 2.1% fail on Track rod end
  - 0.23% fail on Ball joint
- 0.68% fail on Steering gear
  - 0.45% fail on Steering rack
  - 0.23% fail on Operation (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Power steering
  - 0.11% fail on Operation
  - 0.11% fail on Pipes and hoses
  - 0.11% fail on Other components
- 0.23% fail on Steering wheel (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
1.4% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 1.4% fail on Registration plates
0.11% fail on Seat belt installation check
- 0.11% fail on Anchorages