Peugeot 406 MOT Results
Registered in 199754.4% pass rate
from 250 tests in 2021
(23% worse than other 1997 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 406 is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Brakes
(46% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(72% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
8.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(150% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 8.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (160% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(120% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(130% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
6.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(130% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.6% fail on
Rbt
- 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.80% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.6% fail on
Rbt
-
3.2% fail on
Parking brake performance
(170% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Rbt
(180% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Rbt
(180% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
8.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(150% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
-
0.80% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.80% fail on Brake discs
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 1.6% fail on Load sensing valves (12 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.40% fail on Lever
- 0.40% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.40% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.40% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(72% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
15% fail on
Suspension
-
6.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(160% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (9 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.40% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.40% fail on Ball joint
- 0.40% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 5.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
2.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint
- 0.80% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.40% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
1.6% fail on
Other suspension component
- 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (15 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
1.2% fail on
Springs
-
1.2% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.2% fail on Coil spring
-
1.2% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.40% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.40% fail on Ball joint
-
6.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(160% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
11% fail on
Visibility
(65% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Wipers
- 4.8% fail on Washers
-
0.40% fail on
View to rear
- 0.40% fail on Mirrors
-
11% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp
- 0.40% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 3.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
-
3.2% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.40% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.40% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.40% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.40% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.40% fail on Battery(ies)
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamps
-
10% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 7.2% fail on Exhaust system (130% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Transmission
-
2.0% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.0% fail on Joints
-
2.0% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.80% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.80% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.80% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.40% fail on Hose
- 0.40% fail on Pipe
-
0.40% fail on
Chassis
- 0.40% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.40% fail on
Doors
-
0.40% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.40% fail on Door condition
-
0.40% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
9.2% fail on
Steering
(150% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Steering gear
(5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 7.2% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.80% fail on Track rod end
- 0.40% fail on Ball joint
-
1.2% fail on
Power steering
- 1.2% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Steering wheel
-
7.2% fail on
Steering gear
(5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
7.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.6% fail on
Spark ignition
- 4.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.80% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.40% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.40% fail on Emissions not tested
-
5.6% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.80% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.80% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.40% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.40% fail on Sound deadening material
-
6.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.6% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
5.6% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.6% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.2% fail on Condition
- 0.40% fail on Attachment
- 0.40% fail on Requirements
-
5.6% fail on
Seat belts
-
4.0% fail on
Tyres
- 2.0% fail on Condition
- 2.0% fail on Tread depth
-
0.40% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.40% fail on Registration plates
-
0.40% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.40% fail on Speedometer