Peugeot 406 MOT Results
Registered in 199650.3% pass rate
from 310 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 406 is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 6.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 4.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.5% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.5% fail on Front lamps
- 0.32% fail on Rear lamps
- 3.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp
-
2.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.32% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.32% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.9% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.32% fail on Tell tale
- 0.97% fail on Battery
-
22% fail on
Suspension
-
10% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (200% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Attachment
- 0.32% fail on Linkage condition
-
8.1% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 7.4% fail on Component mounting
- 0.65% fail on Subframe mounting
-
4.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.32% fail on Attachment
-
1.9% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.9% fail on Front
-
1.3% fail on
Tie bars/rods
(6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (8 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Drive shafts
(73% better than other 1996 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.97% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.97% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
0.65% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.32% fail on Condition
- 0.32% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.65% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.65% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.65% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.32% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.32% fail on Condition
-
0.32% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
- 0.32% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.32% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.32% fail on Condition
-
0.32% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.32% fail on Condition
- 0.32% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
10% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
16% fail on
Brakes
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
- 4.8% fail on Front wheels
- 4.8% fail on Parking brake performance
- 4.5% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.32% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.32% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
6.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
6.8% fail on
Components
- 2.9% fail on Hoses
- 2.3% fail on Pipes
- 2.3% fail on Valves (5 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Components
-
1.6% fail on
Hub components
- 0.65% fail on Brake pads
- 0.65% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.32% fail on Brake discs
-
0.97% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.97% fail on
Pedal
- 0.97% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Pedal
-
0.65% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.65% fail on Condition
-
0.65% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.65% fail on Cable
- 0.65% fail on ABS
- 0.32% fail on Electronic stability system
- 0.32% fail on Restricted movement
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 7.1% fail on Wipers
- 3.9% fail on Washers
- 0.65% fail on Mirrors
- 0.32% fail on Windscreen
-
11% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 5.5% fail on Exhaust system
- 4.8% fail on Emissions
-
1.3% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.65% fail on System
- 0.32% fail on Tank
- 0.32% fail on Cap
- 0.97% fail on Emissions not tested
-
8.7% fail on
Steering
(84% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
8.1% fail on
Steering system
(100% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Track rod end
-
0.97% fail on
Power steering
- 0.65% fail on Other components
- 0.32% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.32% fail on Pump
- 0.32% fail on Steering operation
-
8.1% fail on
Steering system
(100% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
8.7% fail on
Tyres
- 5.5% fail on Tread depth
- 3.2% fail on Condition
-
7.1% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 5.2% fail on Body condition
-
0.97% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.97% fail on Chassis
- 0.65% fail on Speedometer (12 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Doors
- 0.32% fail on Passengers other
-
6.5% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
5.2% fail on
Seat belts
- 5.2% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.6% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.3% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.32% fail on Drivers airbag
-
5.2% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.6% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.6% fail on Registration plate
-
0.32% fail on
Towbars
- 0.32% fail on Vehicle structure