Peugeot 405 MOT Results
Registered in 199653.3% pass rate
from 60 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 405 is unusually good or bad.
-
30% fail on
Suspension
(140% worse than other 1996 cars)
- 18% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
10% fail on
Suspension arms
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 10% fail on Pins and bushes (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Ball joint
- 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
6.7% fail on
Sub-frames
(10 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (12 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
- 5.0% fail on Wheel bearings
-
25% fail on
Brakes
(120% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
20% fail on
Brake performance
(190% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Service brake performance
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 3.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
8.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 5.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 3.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
8.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
6.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 6.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
8.3% fail on
Service brake performance
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Load sensing valves (50 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
3.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.3% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 3.3% fail on Brake discs
-
3.3% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
1.7% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 1.7% fail on Valves
-
20% fail on
Brake performance
(190% worse than other 1996 cars)
-
17% fail on
Steering
(3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
17% fail on
Steering gear
(13 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 17% fail on Steering rack (15 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.7% fail on Track rod end
-
17% fail on
Steering gear
(13 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 5.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.3% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.7% fail on Electrical wiring
- 1.7% fail on Battery(ies)
-
1.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp
-
1.7% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.7% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
-
5.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
15% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 5.0% fail on Exhaust system
-
5.0% fail on
Transmission
-
5.0% fail on
Drive shafts
- 3.3% fail on Joints
- 1.7% fail on Drive shaft
-
5.0% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.3% fail on
Chassis
- 3.3% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.7% fail on
Doors
-
1.7% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 1.7% fail on Door condition
-
1.7% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
1.7% fail on
Seats
- 1.7% fail on Driver's seat
-
1.7% fail on
Boot lid
- 1.7% fail on Boot lid condition
-
8.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
6.7% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.3% fail on Prescribed areas
- 3.3% fail on Condition
- 1.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
6.7% fail on
Seat belts
-
6.7% fail on
Visibility
- 5.0% fail on Wipers
- 3.3% fail on Washers
-
1.7% fail on
View to rear
- 1.7% fail on Mirrors
-
6.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.7% fail on
Compression ignition
(8 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (11 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Emissions not tested (15 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Compression ignition
(8 times worse than other 1996 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.0% fail on
Tyres
- 3.3% fail on Tread depth
- 1.7% fail on Size/type