Peugeot 405 MOT Results

Registered in 1995
56.0% pass rate
from 323 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 405 is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 8.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.0% fail on Component mounting
      • 3.7% fail on Subframe mounting (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.3% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.3% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.62% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 0.62% fail on Drive shafts (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Front suspension joints (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.62% fail on Attachment
      • 0.62% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.31% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.93% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.93% fail on Condition
    • 0.93% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.62% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Condition
    • 0.93% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.93% fail on Rear
    • 0.31% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.31% fail on Attachment
    • 0.31% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.31% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.31% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.31% fail on Condition
  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 5.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Rear lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.31% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.2% fail on Individual lamps
        • 1.9% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.31% fail on All direction indicators
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.2% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.31% fail on Switch
    • 1.9% fail on Battery
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.31% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.31% fail on Horn
  • 20% fail on Brakes (38% worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (74% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 9.3% fail on Front wheels (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Parking brake performance (100% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.62% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 9.9% fail on Hydraulic systems (71% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 9.0% fail on Components (71% worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 5.0% fail on Pipes
        • 2.8% fail on Valves (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Hoses
        • 0.62% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.62% fail on Leaks
      • 0.31% fail on Operation
    • 1.5% fail on Hub components
      • 0.93% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.93% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical components (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Cable (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.62% fail on Pedal
        • 0.31% fail on Condition
        • 0.31% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.31% fail on ABS
  • 9.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 3.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.31% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.31% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.31% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.1% fail on Steering
    • 7.1% fail on Steering system (82% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint
  • 6.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.2% fail on Emissions (63% better than other 1995 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.62% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.31% fail on Cap
      • 0.31% fail on System
  • 5.3% fail on Tyres
    • 3.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth
  • 4.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.9% fail on Body condition
    • 1.2% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.2% fail on Chassis
    • 1.2% fail on Doors
      • 1.2% fail on Passengers other (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Speedometer (8 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Seats
      • 0.31% fail on Drivers
  • 3.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.93% fail on Condition
    • 0.93% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.62% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.31% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.31% fail on Towbars
    • 0.31% fail on Vehicle structure

Search Good Garages