Peugeot 405 MOT Results
Registered in 199563.1% pass rate
from 141 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 405 is unusually good or bad.
-
21% fail on
Brakes
(84% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
18% fail on
Brake performance
(160% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
9.9% fail on
Service brake performance
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
9.9% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 8.5% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
9.9% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(130% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(150% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
7.8% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(150% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(160% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 7.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
0.71% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.71% fail on
Rbt
- 0.71% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.71% fail on
Rbt
-
9.9% fail on
Service brake performance
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Load sensing valves (22 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.71% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.71% fail on Brake pads
-
0.71% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.71% fail on Brake discs
-
0.71% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.71% fail on Cable
-
0.71% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.71% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.71% fail on Hand lever
-
0.71% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.71% fail on Lever
-
0.71% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.71% fail on Valves
-
0.71% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.71% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.71% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
0.71% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
18% fail on
Brake performance
(160% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
16% fail on
Suspension
- 11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (140% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.71% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.71% fail on Ball joint
- 0.71% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
2.1% fail on
Other suspension component
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Ball joint (12 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.71% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.71% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.71% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.71% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.71% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
-
13% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
4.3% fail on
Transmission
-
4.3% fail on
Drive shafts
- 4.3% fail on Joints
-
4.3% fail on
Drive shafts
- 3.5% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.8% fail on
Chassis
- 2.8% fail on Chassis condition
-
2.1% fail on
Doors
-
1.4% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 1.4% fail on Door condition
-
0.71% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.71% fail on Door condition
-
1.4% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
1.4% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.71% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.71% fail on System
-
4.3% fail on
Transmission
-
11% fail on
Steering
(150% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
8.5% fail on
Steering gear
(6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 8.5% fail on Steering rack (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.8% fail on Track rod end
-
8.5% fail on
Steering gear
(6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
8.5% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 2.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.71% fail on Switch
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.71% fail on
Headlamps
- 0.71% fail on Headlamp
-
0.71% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 0.71% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.71% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.71% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.71% fail on Battery(ies)
-
5.7% fail on
Visibility
- 4.3% fail on Washers
- 2.1% fail on Wipers
-
4.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
4.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.5% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.71% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.4% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.71% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.71% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.71% fail on Emissions not tested
-
3.5% fail on
Spark ignition
-
4.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.5% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.71% fail on Condition
- 0.71% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
2.8% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.8% fail on
Tyres
- 2.1% fail on Condition
- 1.4% fail on Tread depth
-
0.71% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.71% fail on Registration plates