Peugeot 405 MOT Results

Registered in 1994
56.6% pass rate
from 175 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 405 is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.3% fail on Service brake performance (140% worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 5.7% fail on Rbt
          • 4.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.57% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake performance
      • 5.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 5.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 5.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 4.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt
          • 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.57% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.57% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.9% fail on Load sensing valves (13 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Cable (7 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.57% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.1% fail on Lever
    • 0.57% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.57% fail on Pedal
    • 0.57% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.57% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.57% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.57% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 4.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.4% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.57% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 4.0% fail on Sub-frames (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.57% fail on Axles
      • 0.57% fail on Axle
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.0% fail on Transmission
      • 4.0% fail on Drive shafts
        • 4.0% fail on Joints
    • 1.7% fail on Doors
      • 1.1% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.57% fail on Door condition
        • 0.57% fail on Catch
      • 0.57% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.57% fail on Door condition
    • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.1% fail on Chassis
      • 1.1% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.57% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.57% fail on Hose
  • 10% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp levelling device (6 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.3% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.57% fail on Switch
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.1% fail on Horn
      • 0.57% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.57% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.57% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.57% fail on All direction indicators
  • 9.1% fail on Steering (100% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Steering gear (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.1% fail on Power steering
      • 1.1% fail on Pipes and hoses (7 times worse than other 1994 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Operation
  • 8.0% fail on Visibility
    • 4.6% fail on Washers
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 0.57% fail on Driver's view
  • 6.3% fail on Tyres
    • 5.1% fail on Tread depth (190% worse than other 1994 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Condition
  • 4.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 0.57% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.57% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 2.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.57% fail on Condition
  • 0.57% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.57% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages