Peugeot 405 MOT Results
Registered in 199260.0% pass rate
from 50 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 405 is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Brakes
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
-
12% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
12% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 8.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Service brake performance
-
12% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 6.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
4.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.0% fail on
Rbt
- 4.0% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.0% fail on
Rbt
-
2.0% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
- 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance
-
2.0% fail on
Rbt
-
12% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.0% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 2.0% fail on Servos
- 2.0% fail on Load sensing valves
-
2.0% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 2.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
-
20% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 8.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
6.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
6.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.0% fail on All direction indicators
- 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 2.0% fail on Side repeaters
-
6.0% fail on
Flashing type
-
4.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.0% fail on Headlamp
-
2.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
2.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
2.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
14% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
8.0% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
8.0% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 8.0% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
8.0% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 2.0% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.0% fail on
Fuel system
- 2.0% fail on Hose
- 2.0% fail on Bumpers
-
2.0% fail on
Doors
-
2.0% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 2.0% fail on Door condition
-
2.0% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
8.0% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
12% fail on
Steering
(190% worse than other 1992 cars)
-
12% fail on
Steering gear
(7 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 12% fail on Steering rack (8 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
12% fail on
Steering gear
(7 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
8.0% fail on
Visibility
- 6.0% fail on Wipers
- 2.0% fail on Washers
-
6.0% fail on
Suspension
- 4.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings
-
2.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
2.0% fail on
Sub-frames
- 2.0% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
4.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
4.0% fail on
Seat belts
- 4.0% fail on Prescribed areas
-
4.0% fail on
Seat belts
-
4.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
2.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.0% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.0% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
2.0% fail on
Spark ignition
-
2.0% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 2.0% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
2.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.0% fail on
Tyres
- 4.0% fail on Tread depth