Peugeot 4007 MOT Results

Registered in 2009
58.1% pass rate
from 654 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 4007 is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 7.3% fail on Suspension arms (57% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.92% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 6.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (65% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 2.8% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Springs (60% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Coil springs (60% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Coil spring (60% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.61% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.31% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.31% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.15% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.15% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 14% fail on Steering (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 13% fail on Steering linkage components (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 13% fail on Track rod end (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.31% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.31% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.15% fail on Power steering
      • 0.15% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.15% fail on Steering play
      • 0.15% fail on Steering rack
  • 12% fail on Brakes (35% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt
          • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.92% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.76% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (70% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.46% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 4.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.3% fail on Brake discs and drums (99% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Brake discs (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.46% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.31% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.15% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.46% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.46% fail on Lever
    • 0.31% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.31% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.15% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 9.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp (60% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.15% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.15% fail on Switch
    • 0.15% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.15% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.15% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 6.3% fail on Visibility
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.31% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.31% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.15% fail on View to rear
      • 0.15% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.8% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
  • 2.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.5% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.46% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.76% fail on Spark ignition (72% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.76% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.46% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.31% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.15% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.15% fail on Undertray
  • 2.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (51% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Tank (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.46% fail on Undertray (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Exhaust system (84% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Spare wheel (40 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Spare wheel condition (63 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Transmission (84% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.15% fail on Joints
      • 0.15% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.15% fail on Joints
    • 0.15% fail on Bumpers
  • 0.46% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.31% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.15% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.15% fail on Condition
  • 0.46% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.46% fail on Attachment
  • 0.15% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.15% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages