Peugeot 4007 MOT Results

Registered in 2009

58.4% pass rate

from 728 tests in 2020

(15% worse than other 2009 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 4007 is unusually good or bad.

16% fail on Steering (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 16% fail on Steering linkage components (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 15% fail on Track rod end (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.27% fail on Ball joint
- 0.14% fail on Steering gear
  - 0.14% fail on Steering rack
- 0.14% fail on Steering play
  - 0.14% fail on Steering rack
15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
- 4.0% fail on Position lamps (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 4.0% fail on Position lamp (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 2.2% fail on Headlamps
  - 1.2% fail on Headlamp (60% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.82% fail on Headlamp levelling device (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Matched pair
- 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.27% fail on Trailer electrical socket (23 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Battery(ies)
  - 0.14% fail on Horn
- 0.27% fail on Rear reflectors
14% fail on Suspension
- 5.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (65% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 2.6% fail on Linkage ball joints (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 1.1% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.96% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.96% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 0.14% fail on Anti-roll bar
  - 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.14% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 4.7% fail on Suspension arms
  - 2.5% fail on Ball joint
  - 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.69% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 2.6% fail on Springs
  - 2.6% fail on Coil springs
    - 2.6% fail on Coil spring
- 2.3% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.41% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.41% fail on Ball joint
- 0.27% fail on Wheel bearings
11% fail on Brakes (35% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (61% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 3.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 3.4% fail on Brake pads
  - 2.2% fail on Brake discs and drums (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 2.1% fail on Brake discs
    - 0.14% fail on Brake drums
  - 0.14% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
    - 0.14% fail on Lever
- 3.2% fail on Brake performance
  - 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
    - 2.3% fail on Rbt
      - 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.41% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.14% fail on Decelerometer
      - 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.82% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.69% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.41% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.27% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.14% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
  - 0.41% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (74% better than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.27% fail on Rbt (sp) (82% better than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.14% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
  - 0.27% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 3.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.55% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.41% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  - 0.14% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.27% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.14% fail on Pedal
  - 0.14% fail on Hand lever
- 0.27% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.27% fail on Lever
- 0.27% fail on Flexible brake hoses
6.7% fail on Visibility
- 4.0% fail on Wipers
- 2.3% fail on Washers
- 0.41% fail on Driver's view
- 0.27% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.27% fail on Windscreen
6.2% fail on Tyres
- 4.3% fail on Tread depth
- 2.1% fail on Condition
3.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 2.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 2.1% fail on Compression ignition
    - 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.27% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    - 0.14% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.14% fail on Particulate filter
  - 0.55% fail on Spark ignition (74% better than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.55% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.41% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.41% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.14% fail on Noise suppression
  - 0.14% fail on Undertray
2.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (48% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Spare wheel (81 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.41% fail on Spare wheel condition (79 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.27% fail on Carrier (82 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Exhaust system (75% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.27% fail on Tank (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.27% fail on Undertray
- 0.14% fail on Bumpers
- 0.14% fail on Transmission
  - 0.14% fail on Drive shafts
    - 0.14% fail on Joints
- 0.14% fail on Floor
1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.96% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.96% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.14% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
0.14% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.14% fail on Registration plates
0.14% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.14% fail on Attachment