Peugeot 4007 MOT Results
Registered in 200958.1% pass rate
from 654 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 4007 is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Suspension
-
7.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(57% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.92% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
6.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(65% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.15% fail on Linkage
- 0.15% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 2.8% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Springs
(60% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Coil springs
(60% better than other 2009 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Coil spring (60% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Coil springs
(60% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.61% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.31% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.31% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.31% fail on Ball joint
-
0.15% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.15% fail on Macpherson strut
-
7.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(57% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
14% fail on
Steering
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
13% fail on
Steering linkage components
(5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 13% fail on Track rod end (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Ball joint
- 0.15% fail on Drag link end
-
0.31% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.31% fail on Steering rack
-
0.15% fail on
Power steering
- 0.15% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.15% fail on
Steering play
- 0.15% fail on Steering rack
-
13% fail on
Steering linkage components
(5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
12% fail on
Brakes
(35% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt
- 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.92% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt
- 0.76% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(70% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
3.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.6% fail on Brake pads
-
2.3% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(99% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Brake discs (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.76% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.46% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.31% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.15% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.46% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.46% fail on Lever
-
0.31% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.31% fail on Hand lever
- 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.15% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
4.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
9.8% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(200% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp (60% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.15% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.15% fail on Switch
- 0.15% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.15% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.15% fail on Battery(ies)
-
6.3% fail on
Visibility
- 3.8% fail on Wipers
- 2.0% fail on Washers
-
0.31% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.31% fail on Windscreen
-
0.15% fail on
View to rear
- 0.15% fail on Mirrors
-
5.8% fail on
Tyres
- 3.8% fail on Tread depth
- 2.4% fail on Condition
-
2.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
2.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.5% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.46% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
0.76% fail on
Spark ignition
(72% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.46% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.31% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.15% fail on Other leaks
-
0.15% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.15% fail on Undertray
-
2.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.3% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(51% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.76% fail on
Fuel system
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Tank (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.46% fail on Undertray (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Exhaust system (84% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Spare wheel
(40 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Spare wheel condition (63 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Transmission
(84% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.15% fail on Joints
-
0.15% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.15% fail on Joints
-
0.15% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.15% fail on Bumpers
-
0.76% fail on
Fuel system
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.31% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.15% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.15% fail on Condition
-
0.46% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.46% fail on Attachment
-
0.15% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.15% fail on Registration plates