MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 4007 » 2009

Peugeot 4007 MOT Results

Registered in 2009
66.0% pass rate
from 636 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 4007 is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.9% fail on Front lamps (63% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (61% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Fog lamp (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Battery
    • 0.47% fail on Headlamps (82% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.16% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.31% fail on Trailer electrical socket (23 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 9.3% fail on Suspension
    • 2.7% fail on Coil springs
      • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.31% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.31% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.31% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.16% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 8.8% fail on Steering (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.8% fail on Steering system (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.2% fail on Track rod end (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Steering rack
  • 8.5% fail on Brakes
    • 4.4% fail on Hub components
      • 3.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.79% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.94% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.94% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.16% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.16% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.7% fail on Components (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Pipes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.94% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.94% fail on Condition
    • 0.63% fail on Restricted movement (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on ABS
    • 0.16% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.16% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.16% fail on Pedal
        • 0.16% fail on Anti-slip
  • 6.0% fail on Tyres
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type
    • 0.16% fail on Valve stem
  • 4.4% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 2.5% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.63% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.16% fail on Mirrors
  • 0.47% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (76% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.16% fail on Tank
      • 0.16% fail on System
    • 0.16% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.47% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.47% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.31% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.31% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.31% fail on Condition
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages