Peugeot 309 MOT Results
Registered in 199261.2% pass rate
from 98 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 309 is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 7.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 6.1% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.1% fail on Front lamps
- 2.0% fail on Rear lamps
-
5.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.1% fail on Headlamp
- 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 3.1% fail on Battery
-
2.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.0% fail on Fog lamp
-
2.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.0% fail on All direction indicators
- 1.0% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.0% fail on Electrical wiring
- 1.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.0% fail on
Hazard warning
- 1.0% fail on Switch
-
18% fail on
Brakes
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
- 9.2% fail on Front wheels (160% worse than other 1992 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Rear wheels
- 4.1% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.0% fail on Brake imbalance
- 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.0% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
4.1% fail on
Components
- 2.0% fail on Pipes
- 2.0% fail on Hoses
-
4.1% fail on
Components
-
3.1% fail on
Mechanical components
(14 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Cable (17 times worse than other 1992 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.0% fail on Condition
-
1.0% fail on
Service brake control components
-
1.0% fail on
Pedal
- 1.0% fail on Anti-slip
-
1.0% fail on
Pedal
- 1.0% fail on Restricted movement
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Suspension
-
4.1% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 2.0% fail on Component mounting
- 2.0% fail on Subframe mounting
-
3.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
2.0% fail on
Drive shafts
-
2.0% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 2.0% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
2.0% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
1.0% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.0% fail on
Sub-frames
- 1.0% fail on Attachment
-
1.0% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.0% fail on Condition
-
4.1% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
10% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.1% fail on Washers
- 5.1% fail on Wipers
-
7.1% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 5.1% fail on Exhaust system
- 2.0% fail on Emissions
- 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.0% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.0% fail on Hose
-
5.1% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
5.1% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.0% fail on Requirements (11 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.0% fail on Condition
-
5.1% fail on
Seat belts
-
4.1% fail on
Steering
-
3.1% fail on
Steering system
- 2.0% fail on Track rod end
- 1.0% fail on Steering rack
-
1.0% fail on
Power steering
- 1.0% fail on Operation
-
3.1% fail on
Steering system
-
4.1% fail on
Tyres
- 3.1% fail on Tread depth
- 1.0% fail on Condition
-
4.1% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 2.0% fail on Body security (27 times worse than other 1992 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Speedometer
- 1.0% fail on Body condition
-
1.0% fail on
Doors
- 1.0% fail on Passengers front
-
1.0% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.0% fail on Registration plate