Peugeot 309 MOT Results

Registered in 1992
61.2% pass rate
from 98 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 309 is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.1% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.1% fail on Battery
    • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.0% fail on Fog lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.0% fail on All direction indicators
        • 1.0% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.0% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.0% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.0% fail on Switch
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 9.2% fail on Front wheels (160% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Rear wheels
      • 4.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.0% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.0% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.1% fail on Components
        • 2.0% fail on Pipes
        • 2.0% fail on Hoses
    • 3.1% fail on Mechanical components (14 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Cable (17 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.0% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.0% fail on Pedal
        • 1.0% fail on Anti-slip
    • 1.0% fail on Restricted movement
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 4.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 2.0% fail on Component mounting
      • 2.0% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 3.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.0% fail on Drive shafts
      • 2.0% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.0% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.0% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.0% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.0% fail on Attachment
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
  • 10% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.1% fail on Washers
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers
  • 7.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.0% fail on Emissions
    • 2.0% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.0% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.0% fail on Hose
  • 5.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 5.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.0% fail on Requirements (11 times worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
  • 4.1% fail on Steering
    • 3.1% fail on Steering system
      • 2.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.0% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.0% fail on Power steering
      • 1.0% fail on Operation
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.0% fail on Condition
  • 4.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.0% fail on Body security (27 times worse than other 1992 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Speedometer
    • 1.0% fail on Body condition
    • 1.0% fail on Doors
      • 1.0% fail on Passengers front
  • 1.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages