Peugeot 309 MOT Results

Registered in 1992
62.9% pass rate
from 97 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1992 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 309 is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 7.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 5.2% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1992 cars)
          • 4.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 6.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.2% fail on Rbt
          • 5.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 3.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 1.0% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.0% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 3.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.0% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.0% fail on Pedal
    • 1.0% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 1.0% fail on Servos
    • 1.0% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 1.0% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 1.0% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 1.0% fail on Dipswitch
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.0% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.1% fail on Horn
    • 1.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.0% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.2% fail on Transmission (180% worse than other 1992 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 6.2% fail on Joints
      • 1.0% fail on Prop shafts
        • 1.0% fail on Joints
    • 4.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.0% fail on Chassis
      • 1.0% fail on Chassis condition
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 6.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.1% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.0% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.0% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 10% fail on Visibility
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers
    • 5.2% fail on Washers
    • 1.0% fail on Bonnet
    • 1.0% fail on View to rear
      • 1.0% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.2% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.1% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 1.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 1.0% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.0% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 5.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 5.2% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 2.1% fail on Steering
    • 1.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.0% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.0% fail on Steering wheel
  • 1.0% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.0% fail on Attachment
  • 1.0% fail on Tyres
    • 1.0% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages