MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Peugeot » 308 » 2010

Peugeot 308 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
56.9% pass rate
from 16,377 tests in 2021
(20% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 308 is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamps (75% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Headlamp (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Headlamp levelling device (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Dipswitch
    • 5.0% fail on Stop lamp (73% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim (49% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (51% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators (37% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type (37% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.96% fail on Individual direction indicators (24% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.31% fail on Side repeaters (58% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.067% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.68% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.68% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.68% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.0061% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.0061% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 0.49% fail on Reversing lamps (83% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Reversing lamps (85% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0061% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.15% fail on Electrical equipment (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.043% fail on Horn (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Battery(ies) (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.079% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.079% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.012% fail on Rear reflectors (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.012% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.012% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.0061% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.0061% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.0061% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.0061% fail on Switch
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 8.5% fail on Springs (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Coil springs (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 8.5% fail on Coil spring (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.031% fail on Mounting
      • 0.012% fail on Torsion bars (31 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.012% fail on Torsion bar (48 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms (40% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint (28% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Pins and bushes (51% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0061% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.0061% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (33% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.50% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (57% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover (57% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Linkage (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.024% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.024% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.0061% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0061% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.95% fail on Wheel bearings (72% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Other suspension component (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.012% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0061% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.30% fail on Shock absorbers (64% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Macpherson strut (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.067% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0061% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0061% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.092% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.061% fail on Axles (59% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (56% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.037% fail on Sub-frames (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0061% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.0061% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.0061% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.031% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.018% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.012% fail on Ball joint
  • 8.9% fail on Brakes (12% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (50% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Brake pads (50% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.018% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums (39% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0061% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.098% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.085% fail on Cable
        • 0.012% fail on Lever
        • 0.0061% fail on Linkage
    • 3.5% fail on Brake performance (13% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance (17% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (19% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance (31% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake imbalance (49% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.012% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0061% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.0061% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0061% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0061% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.96% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (46% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.95% fail on Rbt (sp) (44% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.012% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 0.38% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (31% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Rbt (sp) (30% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance (49% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.29% fail on Parking brake performance (64% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Rbt (62% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.25% fail on Parking brake performance (63% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.031% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.0061% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.098% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.26% fail on Flexible brake hoses (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (36% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Pedal
      • 0.037% fail on Hand lever (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.018% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.0061% fail on Servos
    • 0.098% fail on Parking brake control (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Lever (68% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.043% fail on Rigid brake pipes (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.043% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.0061% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0061% fail on Servos
    • 0.0061% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.0061% fail on Other components
  • 7.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Spark ignition (77% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Catalyst emissions (91% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.043% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.0061% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0061% fail on NOx sensor
      • 3.5% fail on Compression ignition (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.067% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.037% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.024% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.012% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0061% fail on Particulate filter
          • 0.0061% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.012% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Fluid leaks (95% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Engine oil leaks (92% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.024% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.0061% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.037% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.018% fail on Sound deadening material
      • 0.018% fail on Undertray
  • 7.2% fail on Tyres (20% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth (31% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Size/type
  • 6.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.2% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.018% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.018% fail on Flexible couplings (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Prop shafts (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Belts
    • 0.82% fail on Exhaust system (51% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Body
      • 0.11% fail on Other body component
      • 0.012% fail on Panel
      • 0.0061% fail on Body condition
    • 0.12% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.079% fail on Undertray (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.073% fail on Doors (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.024% fail on Door condition
        • 0.0061% fail on Catch
      • 0.031% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.024% fail on Door condition
        • 0.0061% fail on Hinge
      • 0.012% fail on Other passenger's door (82% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0061% fail on Door condition
        • 0.0061% fail on Hinge
    • 0.073% fail on Seats
      • 0.037% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.037% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.067% fail on Fuel system (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.037% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Pipe
      • 0.012% fail on Tank
    • 0.049% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.043% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.0061% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.024% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.018% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.0061% fail on Bracket
    • 0.018% fail on Passenger compartment (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0061% fail on Chassis
      • 0.0061% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.0061% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.0061% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.0061% fail on Towbar
      • 0.0061% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.0061% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.0061% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 5.7% fail on Visibility
    • 3.6% fail on Washers (34% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Wipers (23% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Condition of glass (84% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Windscreen (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0061% fail on Window
    • 0.13% fail on View to rear
      • 0.12% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.012% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.055% fail on Bonnet (60% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 4.0% fail on Steering (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Steering linkage components (94% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Track rod end (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.012% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0061% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.10% fail on Steering gear (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Steering rack (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Operation
    • 0.10% fail on Steering wheel (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.067% fail on Power steering
      • 0.037% fail on Operation
      • 0.018% fail on Rams (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0061% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.0061% fail on Other components
    • 0.018% fail on Steering play
      • 0.018% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.012% fail on Steering column
    • 0.012% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.75% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.46% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.32% fail on Condition
      • 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Requirements
      • 0.012% fail on Attachment
    • 0.28% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.024% fail on Airbags
      • 0.024% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.39% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.39% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.31% fail on Road Wheels (34% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Attachment
    • 0.049% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2010 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages