Peugeot 308 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
66.9% pass rate
from 16,308 tests in 2017
(11% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 308 is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (30% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim (75% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Registration plate lamp (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamps (95% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.0061% fail on Headlamp levelling device
        • 0.0061% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.0061% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.6% fail on Stop lamp (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Position lamps (35% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Front lamps (40% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.018% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.44% fail on Direction indicators (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Flashing type (71% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Individual lamps (69% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Side repeaters (74% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on All direction indicators (67% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.012% fail on Switch
        • 0.0061% fail on Tell tales
    • 0.41% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.41% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.092% fail on Horn (49% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.031% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.018% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.012% fail on Lamp
      • 0.0061% fail on Switch
    • 0.012% fail on Battery (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.012% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.012% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 8.2% fail on Tyres (22% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Tread depth (45% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.092% fail on Size/type
    • 0.086% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.012% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (90% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 7.4% fail on Brakes (32% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Hub components (56% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Brake pads (62% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Brake discs (56% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.012% fail on Brake linings
    • 2.5% fail on Brake performance (14% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Rear wheels (88% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Front wheels (43% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Parking brake performance (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake imbalance (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.025% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.012% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.53% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.49% fail on Components
        • 0.39% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.067% fail on Pipes (77% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.018% fail on Leaks
      • 0.012% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.012% fail on Operation
    • 0.37% fail on ABS (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Restricted movement (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.13% fail on Pedal
        • 0.12% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.0061% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.098% fail on Parking brake (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Condition (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.012% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0061% fail on Operation
      • 0.0061% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 0.0061% fail on Components
        • 0.0061% fail on Servos
    • 0.0061% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.0061% fail on Cable
  • 6.8% fail on Suspension (16% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Coil springs (15% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Condition (15% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Location
    • 1.6% fail on Drive shafts (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Front drive shafts (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Constant velocity joints (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.012% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.88% fail on Anti-roll bars (45% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (45% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.012% fail on Linkage condition (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Wheel bearings (51% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Front (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Rear (54% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Suspension arms (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0061% fail on Attachment
    • 0.19% fail on Front suspension joints (45% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Shock absorbers (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Condition (87% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.061% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.061% fail on Condition
    • 0.025% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.025% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.012% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.012% fail on Attachment
    • 0.0061% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.0061% fail on Condition
    • 0.0061% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.0061% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 4.0% fail on Driver's view of the road (15% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Washers (37% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Wipers (54% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.074% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.018% fail on Bonnet (80% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 1.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.61% fail on Emissions (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Exhaust system (48% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.061% fail on System
      • 0.037% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Cap (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0061% fail on Pipe
    • 0.098% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.69% fail on Steering (33% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Steering system (37% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Track rod end (24% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.025% fail on Steering rack (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0061% fail on Free play
        • 0.0061% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.0061% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.049% fail on Steering control (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Steering column (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.018% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.0061% fail on Steering lock
    • 0.037% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.025% fail on Power steering
      • 0.0061% fail on Electronic power steering
      • 0.0061% fail on Operation
      • 0.0061% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.0061% fail on Pump
  • 0.49% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.49% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.39% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (28% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
      • 0.018% fail on Requirements
      • 0.0061% fail on Attachment
      • 0.0061% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.13% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (49% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.27% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.17% fail on Body condition (72% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.043% fail on Seats
      • 0.037% fail on Passengers
      • 0.0061% fail on Drivers
    • 0.031% fail on Body security
    • 0.018% fail on Doors (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.0061% fail on Drivers
    • 0.012% fail on Spare wheel
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment
    • 0.025% fail on Condition (77% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.0061% fail on Towbars
    • 0.0061% fail on Towbar

Search Good Garages