Peugeot 308 MOT Results

Registered in 2010
60.5% pass rate
from 18,322 tests in 2020
(16% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 308 is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (27% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamps (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Headlamp (88% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Headlamp levelling device (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.011% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.0055% fail on Matched pair
    • 4.9% fail on Stop lamp (64% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Position lamps (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.95% fail on Position lamp (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.88% fail on Direction indicators (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Flashing type (52% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Individual direction indicators (47% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Side repeaters (58% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on All direction indicators (62% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (30% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.56% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.022% fail on Switch
      • 0.016% fail on Front fog lamps (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Front fog lamps (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Reversing lamps (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Reversing lamps (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0055% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.11% fail on Electrical equipment (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Horn (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Battery(ies) (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.011% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.027% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.022% fail on Daytime running lamps (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0055% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.0055% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 9.5% fail on Suspension (12% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Springs (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Coil springs (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 6.1% fail on Coil spring (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.033% fail on Mounting
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.027% fail on Linkage (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.0055% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0055% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms (57% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Ball joint (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Pins and bushes (64% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0055% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.69% fail on Wheel bearings (55% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Shock absorbers (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.011% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.0055% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.14% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.087% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.011% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0055% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.022% fail on Axles (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (70% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.022% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.016% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0055% fail on Suspension rod
    • 0.011% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 8.5% fail on Brakes (19% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (58% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Brake pads (58% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums (51% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs (51% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.055% fail on Cable
        • 0.011% fail on Lever
        • 0.0055% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 3.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (45% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance (58% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake imbalance (31% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0055% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0055% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.59% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (55% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Rbt (sp) (53% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0055% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 0.34% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.34% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance (37% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.0055% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.0055% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.082% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.071% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.060% fail on Rbt (90% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.060% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0055% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.0055% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 0.84% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Anti-lock braking system (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Electronic stability control (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Flexible brake hoses (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (36% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Pedal
      • 0.060% fail on Hand lever (65% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.027% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.065% fail on Parking brake control (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Lever (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.027% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.016% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.038% fail on Rigid brake pipes (93% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.016% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0055% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 0.0055% fail on Leaks
      • 0.0055% fail on Servos
    • 0.011% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.011% fail on Other components
  • 7.4% fail on Tyres (17% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Tread depth (33% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Size/type
  • 6.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Compression ignition (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.34% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.049% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.022% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.011% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.0055% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0055% fail on Other emission control equipment
      • 3.0% fail on Spark ignition (98% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Catalyst emissions (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.044% fail on Non catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Fluid leaks (97% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Engine oil leaks (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.0055% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.044% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.038% fail on Undertray
      • 0.0055% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 4.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (49% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Flexible couplings
        • 0.0055% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.13% fail on Prop shafts (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Joints (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.65% fail on Exhaust system (52% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.13% fail on Body
      • 0.093% fail on Other body component
      • 0.033% fail on Panel
    • 0.098% fail on Undertray (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.065% fail on Fuel system (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Pipe
      • 0.011% fail on Hose
      • 0.011% fail on System
    • 0.044% fail on Seats
      • 0.027% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.016% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.033% fail on Doors (78% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.016% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.016% fail on Door condition
      • 0.011% fail on Front passenger's door (82% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Door condition (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0055% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.0055% fail on Door condition
    • 0.027% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.016% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.011% fail on Carrier
    • 0.016% fail on Towbar
      • 0.011% fail on Towbar condition (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0055% fail on Coupling
    • 0.011% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.011% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.0055% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.0055% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.0055% fail on Chassis
      • 0.0055% fail on Chassis condition
  • 4.6% fail on Visibility
    • 3.0% fail on Washers (28% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Wipers (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.098% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.082% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.082% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.060% fail on View to rear (58% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Mirrors (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0055% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.033% fail on Bonnet (71% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 2.6% fail on Steering (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Steering linkage components (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Track rod end (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.022% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.011% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.0055% fail on Lock stop
    • 0.076% fail on Steering gear (57% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Steering rack (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Operation
    • 0.033% fail on Steering wheel (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.027% fail on Power steering
      • 0.022% fail on Operation
      • 0.0055% fail on Pump
    • 0.016% fail on Steering play
      • 0.016% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.0055% fail on Steering column
    • 0.0055% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.0055% fail on Universal joint
  • 0.52% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (29% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
      • 0.022% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.0055% fail on Attachment
      • 0.0055% fail on Requirements
    • 0.23% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (39% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Airbags
      • 0.011% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.40% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.40% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.27% fail on Road Wheels (33% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Attachment
    • 0.049% fail on Condition (60% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.011% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.011% fail on Anchorages

Search Good Garages