Peugeot 307 MOT Results

Registered in 2009

55.2% pass rate

from 531 tests in 2021

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Peugeot 307 is unusually good or bad.

15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 5.5% fail on Headlamps (69% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 5.1% fail on Headlamp (66% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.38% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.94% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.4% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.2% fail on Direction indicators
  - 3.2% fail on Flashing type
    - 2.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
    - 0.56% fail on Side repeaters
    - 0.38% fail on All direction indicators
- 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 1.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.56% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.38% fail on Battery(ies)
  - 0.19% fail on Horn
13% fail on Suspension
- 4.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 0.94% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.94% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 0.56% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.19% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 4.0% fail on Springs
  - 4.0% fail on Coil springs
    - 3.8% fail on Coil spring
    - 0.19% fail on Mounting
- 3.6% fail on Suspension arms
  - 2.3% fail on Ball joint
  - 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.38% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.75% fail on Axles
  - 0.56% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  - 0.19% fail on Axle
- 0.56% fail on Sub-frames
  - 0.19% fail on Sub-frame
  - 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.19% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.38% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 0.19% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.19% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.19% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.19% fail on Suspension rods
  - 0.19% fail on Ball joint
12% fail on Brakes
- 5.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (96% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 3.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 3.4% fail on Brake pads
  - 2.6% fail on Brake discs and drums (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 2.6% fail on Brake discs (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.38% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
    - 0.38% fail on Cable
- 4.7% fail on Brake performance
  - 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
    - 2.6% fail on Rbt
      - 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.19% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.19% fail on Plate brake tester
      - 0.19% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 2.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 2.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 0.75% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.75% fail on Rbt
      - 0.75% fail on Parking brake performance
  - 0.38% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.38% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.19% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.19% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 2.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 2.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.75% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.56% fail on Lever
- 0.38% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 0.19% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.19% fail on Hand lever
- 0.19% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.19% fail on Brake fluid
9.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 6.6% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 6.6% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.19% fail on Prop shafts
    - 0.19% fail on Joints
- 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.38% fail on Undertray (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 0.19% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.19% fail on Bumpers
- 0.19% fail on Engine mounting
  - 0.19% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.19% fail on Seats
  - 0.19% fail on Passenger's seat
7.2% fail on Tyres
- 4.5% fail on Tread depth
- 1.9% fail on Condition
- 1.1% fail on Size/type (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
7.0% fail on Steering (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Steering linkage components (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 5.3% fail on Track rod end (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.19% fail on Steering arm
  - 0.19% fail on Other components
    - 0.19% fail on Steering linkage
- 1.1% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.94% fail on Steering rack
  - 0.19% fail on Operation
- 0.38% fail on Power steering
  - 0.19% fail on Operation
  - 0.19% fail on Pipes and hoses
  - 0.19% fail on Pump
- 0.19% fail on Steering play
  - 0.19% fail on Steering rack
5.6% fail on Visibility
- 3.0% fail on Wipers
- 2.1% fail on Washers
- 0.38% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.38% fail on Windscreen
- 0.19% fail on Bonnet
- 0.19% fail on View to rear
  - 0.19% fail on Mirrors
4.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 3.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 2.4% fail on Compression ignition
    - 1.7% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    - 0.75% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.19% fail on Emissions not tested
  - 1.5% fail on Spark ignition
    - 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.56% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.38% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.38% fail on Engine oil leaks
1.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.19% fail on Condition
0.19% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.19% fail on Attachment